Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update mdbook version #39966

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 20, 2017
Merged

Update mdbook version #39966

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 20, 2017

Conversation

steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

This version of mdbook includes
https://github.com/azerupi/mdBook/pull/207 , which is needed so that
we can start doing linkchecker on the various books.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @brson

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member Author

r? @GuillaumeGomez

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 20, 2017

📌 Commit 4cc4944 has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

This version of mdbook includes
https://github.com/azerupi/mdBook/pull/207 , which is needed so that
we can start doing linkchecker on the various books.
In order to update mdbook, we have to update other stuff too.
@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: r=GuillaumeGomez rollup

I didn't notice we needed to update other deps too, oops 😓

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 20, 2017

📌 Commit 2795de3 has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: p=1

(All the other commits in the queue are r+'d by me, I'd like this one to land first)

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 20, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 2795de3 with merge bcd62ac...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 20, 2017

💔 Test failed - status-appveyor

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member Author

@bors: retry

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 20, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 2795de3 with merge 322f0d7...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2017
Update mdbook version

This version of mdbook includes
https://github.com/azerupi/mdBook/pull/207 , which is needed so that
we can start doing linkchecker on the various books.
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 20, 2017

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: GuillaumeGomez
Pushing 322f0d7 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 2795de3 into rust-lang:master Feb 20, 2017
steveklabnik added a commit to steveklabnik/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2017
This reverts commit 7f1d1c6.

The original commit was created because mdBook and rustdoc had
different generation algorithms for header links; now with
rust-lang#39966 , the algorithms
are the same. So let's undo this change.

... when I came across this problem, I said "eh, this isn't fun,
but it doesn't take that long." I probably should have just actually
taken the time to fix upstream, given that they were amenable. Oh
well!
steveklabnik added a commit to steveklabnik/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2017
Previously, mdBook used JavaScript to add header links, so we
skipped checking the book. As of
rust-lang#39966, it no longer does,
so we can start checking again.

There is a twist, though: it uses name instead of id, so let's test
for both. They're both valid links anyway, so it's good to have the
checker check anyway.
anatol pushed a commit to anatol/steed that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2017
This reverts commit 7f1d1c6d9a7be5e427bace30e740b16b25f25c92.

The original commit was created because mdBook and rustdoc had
different generation algorithms for header links; now with
rust-lang/rust#39966 , the algorithms
are the same. So let's undo this change.

... when I came across this problem, I said "eh, this isn't fun,
but it doesn't take that long." I probably should have just actually
taken the time to fix upstream, given that they were amenable. Oh
well!
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants