Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

move Cargo.toml to live alongside x.py #48236

Conversation

nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

@nikomatsakis nikomatsakis commented Feb 15, 2018

This makes it so that, when you ./x.py, you get errors relative to the location of x.py. I would also be fine with moving x.py into src, if that is deemed preferable. (Is this a good idea?) One or the other seems to make sense to me, but I'm curious what others think. =)

r? @alexcrichton
cc @pnkfelix

(I suppose one could also run ../x.py from the src directory, but then that creates src/build directory, which I don't particularly like.)

(Also, this is only minimally tested.)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 15, 2018
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+

I think there's another PR to do this already as well though? It may need rebasing maybe

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 16, 2018

📌 Commit 882ff7d has been approved by alexcrichton

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 16, 2018
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2018
…o-toml, r=alexcrichton

move Cargo.toml to live alongside x.py

This makes it so that, when you `./x.py`, you get errors relative to the location of `x.py`. I would also be fine with moving `x.py` into `src`, if that is deemed preferable. (Is this a good idea?) One of the other seems to make sense to me, but I'm curious what others think. =)

r? @alexcrichton
cc @pnkfelix

(I suppose one could also run `../x.py` from the `src` directory, but then that creates `src/build` directory, which I don't particularly like.)

(Also, this is only minimally tested.)
@pnkfelix
Copy link
Member

For the record, I believe the other PR that @alexcrichton is referring to is PR #47731

@pnkfelix
Copy link
Member

(which means ... is this likely to not pass bors unless it incorporates the fixups that have been incrementally added to #47731 ? hmm...)

@pnkfelix
Copy link
Member

(also it would be good if this were tagged with "Fix #47355", the same way that #47731 is.)

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

Yes, I'm going to just close this in favor of #47731.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants