Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add rustdoc to x.py check #50062

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Apr 20, 2018
Merged

Add rustdoc to x.py check #50062

merged 2 commits into from Apr 20, 2018

Conversation

varkor
Copy link
Member

@varkor varkor commented Apr 18, 2018

Modifying rustc can often cause errors in rustdoc, so it's useful to include it in the steps that are checked.

One thing that I was unsure about was when to call clear_if_dirty (both in this step, and in other steps in relation to this one) — we want to be sure rustdoc will always be rechecked after modifying previous steps — but does this belong in rustdoc, or the other steps?

Fixes #49917.

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 19, 2018

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #49890) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. label Apr 19, 2018
This can often encounter errors after modifying rustc, so it's useful to include it in the steps that are checked.
@rust-highfive

This comment has been minimized.

@varkor varkor added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Apr 19, 2018
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 20, 2018

📌 Commit 261da71 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 20, 2018
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 20, 2018

⌛ Testing commit 261da71 with merge 6586074...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 20, 2018
Add rustdoc to x.py check

Modifying rustc can often cause errors in rustdoc, so it's useful to include it in the steps that are checked.

One thing that I was unsure about was when to call `clear_if_dirty` (both in this step, and in other steps in relation to this one) — we want to be sure rustdoc will always be rechecked after modifying previous steps — but does this belong in rustdoc, or the other steps?

Fixes #49917.

r? @Mark-Simulacrum
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 20, 2018

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing 6586074 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 261da71 into rust-lang:master Apr 20, 2018
@varkor varkor deleted the xpy-check-rustdoc branch April 20, 2018 15:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants