Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Propose backport of "Fix self referential impl Trait substitutions" #50737

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

leoyvens
Copy link
Contributor

@leoyvens leoyvens commented May 14, 2018

Backport of #50694 which was a small fix for a significant issue.

r? @petrochenkov

A high impact bug because a lot of common traits use a `Self`
substitution by default. Should be backported to beta.

There was a check for this which wasn't catching all cases, it was made
more robust.

Fixes rust-lang#49376
Fixes rust-lang#50626

r? @petrochenkov
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

warning Warning warning

  • Pull requests are usually filed against the master branch for this repo, but this one is against beta. Please double check that you specified the right target!

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 14, 2018
@leoyvens leoyvens changed the title Propose backport of Fix self referential impl Trait substitutions Propose backport of "Fix self referential impl Trait substitutions" May 14, 2018
@petrochenkov petrochenkov added the beta-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label May 14, 2018
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

petrochenkov commented May 14, 2018

I don't know what is the process for accepting backports to beta.
r? @nikomatsakis

@pietroalbini pietroalbini removed the beta-nominated Nominated for backporting to the compiler in the beta channel. label May 14, 2018
@pietroalbini
Copy link
Member

The beta-* labels should be on the original PR, not in the backport :)
Also, maybe we can merge this backport (if it's accepted) into #50741, to avoid filling up the bors queue.

@pietroalbini
Copy link
Member

The queue is long enough, let's not have two different backport PRs open. Cherry-picked this into #50741.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants