Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't try to clean predicates involving ReErased #57851

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 5, 2019

Conversation

Aaron1011
Copy link
Member

There's nothing to render when we have a bound involving ReErased (either
a type or region outliving it), so we don't attempt to generate a clean
WherePredicate

Fixes #57806

I haven't been able to come up with a minimized reproduction for the issue, but I've confirmed that this allows the docs to build for parqet-rs

There's nothing to render when we have a bound involving ReErased (either
a type or region outliving it), so we don't attempt to generate a clean
WherePredicate

Fixes rust-lang#57806
@Centril
Copy link
Contributor

Centril commented Jan 23, 2019

r? @QuietMisdreavus

@Dylan-DPC-zz Dylan-DPC-zz added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 23, 2019
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@bors: r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 4, 2019

📌 Commit e4fedf4 has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 4, 2019
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 4, 2019

⌛ Testing commit e4fedf4 with merge 1edb31f...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2019
Don't try to clean predicates involving ReErased

There's nothing to render when we have a bound involving ReErased (either
a type or region outliving it), so we don't attempt to generate a clean
WherePredicate

Fixes #57806

I haven't been able to come up with a minimized reproduction for the issue, but I've confirmed that this allows the docs to build for `parqet-rs`
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 4, 2019

💔 Test failed - status-appveyor

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Feb 4, 2019
@Aaron1011
Copy link
Member Author

@GuillaumeGomez: This appears to be a spurious failure. Here's the end of the log for the failing Appveyor log:

Successful compile (408.281 sec). Resulting Setup program filename is:
C:\projects\rust\build\tmp\dist\exe\rust-nightly-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu.exe
rust.wxs
ui.wxs
rustwelcomedlg.wxs
RustcGroup.wxs
DocsGroup.wxs
CargoGroup.wxs
StdGroup.wxs
RlsGroup.wxs
ClippyGroup.wxs
MiriGroup.wxs
AnalysisGroup.wxs
GccGroup.wxs

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Not convenient...

@bors: retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 4, 2019
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 5, 2019

⌛ Testing commit e4fedf4 with merge dadc4eeda88bc5bf9e6e97a3879f2b29d559252e...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 5, 2019

💔 Test failed - checks-travis

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

The job dist-x86_64-apple-alt of your PR failed on Travis (raw log). Through arcane magic we have determined that the following fragments from the build log may contain information about the problem.

Click to expand the log.
[00:01:37]    Compiling serde_derive v1.0.81
[00:01:39]    Compiling toml v0.4.10
[00:01:39]    Compiling serde_json v1.0.33
[00:01:50]    Compiling bootstrap v0.0.0 (/Users/travis/build/rust-lang/rust/src/bootstrap)
No output has been received in the last 30m0s, this potentially indicates a stalled build or something wrong with the build itself.
Check the details on how to adjust your build configuration on: https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/common-build-problems/#Build-times-out-because-no-output-was-received
The build has been terminated

I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact @TimNN. (Feature Requests)

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Feb 5, 2019
@Aaron1011
Copy link
Member Author

@GuillaumeGomez: A travis job seems to have randomly hung.

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 5, 2019
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 5, 2019

⌛ Testing commit e4fedf4 with merge ca463abdfee89227b46513db1cae24873401ada4...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 5, 2019

💔 Test failed - checks-travis

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

The job arm-android of your PR failed on Travis (raw log). Through arcane magic we have determined that the following fragments from the build log may contain information about the problem.

Click to expand the log.
[01:41:51] test vec::test_split_at_mut ... ok
[01:41:51] test vec::test_split_off ... ok
[01:41:51] test vec::test_splice_unbounded ... ok
[01:41:51] test vec::test_swap_remove_empty ... ok
[01:41:52] died due to signal 11
[01:41:52] 
[01:41:52] 
[01:41:52] command did not execute successfully: "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/bin/cargo" "test" "--target" "arm-linux-androideabi" "-j" "4" "--release" "--locked" "--color" "always" "--features" "panic-unwind backtrace" "--manifest-path" "/checkout/src/libstd/Cargo.toml" "-p" "alloc" "--"
[01:41:52] expected success, got: exit code: 3
---
travis_time:end:0047c8e0:start=1549383719637788139,finish=1549383719654481604,duration=16693465
travis_fold:end:after_failure.3
travis_fold:start:after_failure.4
travis_time:start:0c8f1ed4
$ ln -s . checkout && for CORE in obj/cores/core.*; do EXE=$(echo $CORE | sed 's|obj/cores/core\.[0-9]*\.!checkout!\(.*\)|\1|;y|!|/|'); if [ -f "$EXE" ]; then printf travis_fold":start:crashlog\n\033[31;1m%s\033[0m\n" "$CORE"; gdb --batch -q -c "$CORE" "$EXE" -iex 'set auto-load off' -iex 'dir src/' -iex 'set sysroot .' -ex bt -ex q; echo travis_fold":"end:crashlog; fi; done || true
travis_fold:end:after_failure.4
travis_fold:start:after_failure.5
travis_time:start:110e7004
travis_time:start:110e7004
$ cat ./obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/native/asan/build/lib/asan/clang_rt.asan-dynamic-i386.vers || true
cat: ./obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/native/asan/build/lib/asan/clang_rt.asan-dynamic-i386.vers: No such file or directory
travis_fold:end:after_failure.5
travis_fold:start:after_failure.6
travis_time:start:0bd44166
$ dmesg | grep -i kill

I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact @TimNN. (Feature Requests)

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Feb 5, 2019
@kennytm
Copy link
Member

kennytm commented Feb 5, 2019

@bors retry #55861

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 5, 2019
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 5, 2019

⌛ Testing commit e4fedf4 with merge 4b1e39b...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2019
Don't try to clean predicates involving ReErased

There's nothing to render when we have a bound involving ReErased (either
a type or region outliving it), so we don't attempt to generate a clean
WherePredicate

Fixes #57806

I haven't been able to come up with a minimized reproduction for the issue, but I've confirmed that this allows the docs to build for `parqet-rs`
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 5, 2019

☀️ Test successful - checks-travis, status-appveyor
Approved by: GuillaumeGomez
Pushing 4b1e39b to master...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

9 participants