Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: switch appveyor to gce builders to try debugging the 259 failure #58597

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 21, 2019

Conversation

pietroalbini
Copy link
Member

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 20, 2019
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ p=1

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 20, 2019

📌 Commit 703e236 has been approved by alexcrichton

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 20, 2019
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 21, 2019

⌛ Testing commit 703e236 with merge fe5d50bfc845534a7c3f9a40aefb5eab82862465...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 21, 2019

💔 Test failed - checks-travis

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

The job dist-i586-gnu-i586-i686-musl of your PR failed on Travis (raw log). Through arcane magic we have determined that the following fragments from the build log may contain information about the problem.

Click to expand the log.
[01:19:54] test boxed_test::any_move ... ok
[01:19:54] test boxed_test::deref ... ok
[01:19:54] test boxed_test::f64_slice ... ok
[01:19:54] test boxed_test::i64_slice ... ok
No output has been received in the last 30m0s, this potentially indicates a stalled build or something wrong with the build itself.
Check the details on how to adjust your build configuration on: https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/common-build-problems/#Build-times-out-because-no-output-was-received
The build has been terminated

I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact @TimNN. (Feature Requests)

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Feb 21, 2019
@pietroalbini
Copy link
Member Author

I'm sure we didn't regress travis.

@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 21, 2019
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 21, 2019

⌛ Testing commit 703e236 with merge 7437e36cc2a1c40fe75c6b3fd25160a0facb900b...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 21, 2019

💔 Test failed - checks-travis

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Your PR failed on Travis (raw log). Through arcane magic we have determined that the following fragments from the build log may contain information about the problem.

Click to expand the log.
Attempting to download s3://rust-lang-ci-sccache2/docker/2e5be4e2e48978ebba28950b153fc100a6d9b9e74b018c092b0eeddaf226d91b0a9c9bc603b28da87f7c006299f0a19ea0a1fa7a654d2702cdbc9c5d61a2780b
[00:01:10] Attempting with retry: curl -f -L -C - -o /tmp/rustci_docker_cache https://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/rust-lang-ci-sccache2/docker/2e5be4e2e48978ebba28950b153fc100a6d9b9e74b018c092b0eeddaf226d91b0a9c9bc603b28da87f7c006299f0a19ea0a1fa7a654d2702cdbc9c5d61a2780b
[00:01:10]   % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time  Current
[00:01:10]                                  Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left  Speed
No output has been received in the last 30m0s, this potentially indicates a stalled build or something wrong with the build itself.
Check the details on how to adjust your build configuration on: https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/common-build-problems/#Build-times-out-because-no-output-was-received
The build has been terminated

I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact @TimNN. (Feature Requests)

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Feb 21, 2019
@pietroalbini
Copy link
Member Author

@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 21, 2019
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 21, 2019

⌛ Testing commit 703e236 with merge fd42f24...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2019
ci: switch appveyor to gce builders to try debugging the 259 failure

r? @alexcrichton
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 21, 2019

☀️ Test successful - checks-travis, status-appveyor
Approved by: alexcrichton
Pushing fd42f24 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Feb 21, 2019
@bors bors merged commit 703e236 into rust-lang:master Feb 21, 2019
@pietroalbini pietroalbini deleted the appveyor-gce branch February 21, 2019 18:18
pietroalbini added a commit to pietroalbini/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2019
…alexcrichton"

This reverts commit fd42f24, reversing
changes made to 0e25a68.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants