Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove tx_to_llvm_workers from TyCtxt #64772

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 27, 2019

Conversation

Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

This can be kept within the codegen backend crates entirely -- there's no reason for us to create it outside and attempt to hold it in the (global) context.

Changes here aren't really too easily reviewable I suspect -- not sure if they can be cleaned up by splitting into more commits though, it's just hard to reason about Box<Any> in general. If there are thoughts though I'd be happy to hear them.

The primary goal of this PR is to get rid of the field on rustc_interface::Queries.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @eddyb

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 25, 2019
@rust-highfive

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-highfive

This comment has been minimized.

This can be kept within the codegen backend crates entirely
Copy link
Member

@eddyb eddyb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM (cc @Zoxc)

@eddyb
Copy link
Member

eddyb commented Sep 26, 2019

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 26, 2019

📌 Commit b8a040f has been approved by eddyb

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 26, 2019
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2019
Remove tx_to_llvm_workers from TyCtxt

This can be kept within the codegen backend crates entirely -- there's no reason for us to create it outside and attempt to hold it in the (global) context.

Changes here aren't really too easily reviewable I suspect -- not sure if they can be cleaned up by splitting into more commits though, it's just hard to reason about `Box<Any>` in general. If there are thoughts though I'd be happy to hear them.

The primary goal of this PR is to get rid of the field on `rustc_interface::Queries`.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2019
Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #64221 ( Rust 2015: No longer downgrade NLL errors)
 - #64772 (Remove tx_to_llvm_workers from TyCtxt)
 - #64783 (Fix issue #64732)
 - #64787 (Fix ExitStatus on Fuchsia)
 - #64812 (Add test for E0543)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2019
Rollup of 5 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #64221 ( Rust 2015: No longer downgrade NLL errors)
 - #64772 (Remove tx_to_llvm_workers from TyCtxt)
 - #64783 (Fix issue #64732)
 - #64787 (Fix ExitStatus on Fuchsia)
 - #64812 (Add test for E0543)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit b8a040f into rust-lang:master Sep 27, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants