Don't lose empty where clause when pretty-printing
#73157
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Previously, we would parse `struct Foo where;` and `struct Foo;` identically, leading to an 'empty' `where` clause being omitted during pretty printing. This will cause us to lose spans when proc-macros involved, since we will have a collected `where` token that does not appear in the pretty-printed item. We now explicitly track the presence of a `where` token during parsing, so that we can distinguish between `struct Foo where;` and `struct Foo;` during pretty-printing
|
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit 0fcea2e has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 10, 2020
Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#72706 (Add windows group to triagebot) - rust-lang#72789 (resolve: Do not suggest imports from the same module in which we are resolving) - rust-lang#72890 (improper ctypes: normalize return types and transparent structs) - rust-lang#72897 (normalize adt fields during structural match checking) - rust-lang#73005 (Don't create impl candidates when obligation contains errors) - rust-lang#73023 (Remove noisy suggestion of hash_map ) - rust-lang#73070 (Add regression test for const generic ICE in rust-lang#72819) - rust-lang#73157 (Don't lose empty `where` clause when pretty-printing) - rust-lang#73184 (Reoder order in which MinGW libs are linked to fix recent breakage) Failed merges: r? @ghost
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously, we would parse
struct Foo where;andstruct Foo;identically, leading to an 'empty'
whereclause being omitted duringpretty printing. This will cause us to lose spans when proc-macros
involved, since we will have a collected
wheretoken that does notappear in the pretty-printed item.
We now explicitly track the presence of a
wheretoken during parsing,so that we can distinguish between
struct Foo where;andstruct Foo;during pretty-printing