Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test structural matching for all range types #76339

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 17, 2020

Conversation

CDirkx
Copy link
Contributor

@CDirkx CDirkx commented Sep 4, 2020

As of #70166 all range types (core::ops::Range etc.) can be structurally matched upon, and by extension used in const generics. In reference to the fact that this is a publicly observable property of these types, and thus falls under the Rust stability guarantees of the standard library, a regression test was added in #70283.

This regression test was implemented by me by testing for the ability to use the range types within const generics, but that is not the actual property the std guarantees now (const generics is still unstable). This PR addresses that situation by adding extra tests for the range types that directly test whether they can be structurally matched upon.

Note: also adds the otherwise unrelated test test_range_to_inclusive for completeness with the other range unit tests

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 4, 2020
@JohnCSimon JohnCSimon added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 21, 2020
@Dylan-DPC-zz
Copy link

@matklad any updates on this? thanks

@crlf0710 crlf0710 added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 8, 2020
@camelid camelid added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 30, 2020
@Dylan-DPC-zz
Copy link

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

Hm, looks like there are some conflicts here. But presumably they won't really affect this PR, just need to be resolved.

I think we should probably keep the const generics test around, because it is testing that they can't be used in that context. I don't know that we don't have other tests already testing that, but I see no particular reason to delete it, and I do think that there is some potential for concern given that matching on these values is allowed.

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 5, 2020
@CDirkx CDirkx force-pushed the structural-match-range branch 2 times, most recently from 829ffd9 to bb540e1 Compare November 7, 2020 00:18
@CDirkx
Copy link
Contributor Author

CDirkx commented Nov 7, 2020

I rebased onto master and excluded the changes to the const-generic tests

Adds structural match tests for all range types.

Note: also adds the otherwise unrelated test `test_range_to_inclusive` for completeness
@CDirkx
Copy link
Contributor Author

CDirkx commented Nov 14, 2020

@rustbot modify labels: -S-waiting-on-author +S-waiting-on-review

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Nov 14, 2020
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 15, 2020

📌 Commit 6728240 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 15, 2020
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2020
…rk-Simulacrum

Test structural matching for all range types

As of rust-lang#70166 all range types (`core::ops::Range` etc.) can be structurally matched upon, and by extension used in const generics. In reference to the fact that this is a publicly observable property of these types, and thus falls under the Rust stability guarantees of the standard library, a regression test was added in rust-lang#70283.

This regression test was implemented by me by testing for the ability to use the range types within const generics, but that is not the actual property the std guarantees now (const generics is still unstable). This PR addresses that situation by adding extra tests for the range types that directly test whether they can be structurally matched upon.

Note: also adds the otherwise unrelated test `test_range_to_inclusive` for completeness with the other range unit tests
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2020
Rollup of 11 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#74989 (Implement `Index` and `IndexMut` for arrays)
 - rust-lang#76339 (Test structural matching for all range types)
 - rust-lang#77691 (Rename/Deprecate LayoutErr in favor of LayoutError)
 - rust-lang#78364 (Update RELEASES.md for 1.48.0)
 - rust-lang#78678 (Add tests and improve rendering of cfgs on traits)
 - rust-lang#78714 (Simplify output capturing)
 - rust-lang#78769 (Remove unneeded lifetimes in array/mod.rs)
 - rust-lang#78903 (BTreeMap: test chaotic ordering & other bits & bobs)
 - rust-lang#79032 (improve type const mismatch errors)
 - rust-lang#79061 (Make all rustdoc functions and structs crate-private)
 - rust-lang#79087 (Update E0744 about control flow in `const` contexts to accurately describe when the error is triggered and why)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit de0aa61 into rust-lang:master Nov 17, 2020
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.50.0 milestone Nov 17, 2020
@CDirkx CDirkx deleted the structural-match-range branch April 21, 2021 14:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

10 participants