BTreeMap: stop mistaking node for an orderly place #78437
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit e099138 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Dylan-DPC-zz
pushed a commit
to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 6, 2020
… r=Mark-Simulacrum BTreeMap: stop mistaking node for an orderly place A second mistake in rust-lang#77612 was to ignore the node module's rightful comment "this module doesn't care whether the entries are sorted". And there's a much simpler way to visit the keys in order, if you check this separately from a single pass checking everything. r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
m-ou-se
added a commit
to m-ou-se/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 7, 2020
… r=Mark-Simulacrum BTreeMap: stop mistaking node for an orderly place A second mistake in rust-lang#77612 was to ignore the node module's rightful comment "this module doesn't care whether the entries are sorted". And there's a much simpler way to visit the keys in order, if you check this separately from a single pass checking everything. r? ``@Mark-Simulacrum``
m-ou-se
added a commit
to m-ou-se/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 7, 2020
… r=Mark-Simulacrum BTreeMap: stop mistaking node for an orderly place A second mistake in rust-lang#77612 was to ignore the node module's rightful comment "this module doesn't care whether the entries are sorted". And there's a much simpler way to visit the keys in order, if you check this separately from a single pass checking everything. r? ```@Mark-Simulacrum```
m-ou-se
added a commit
to m-ou-se/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 7, 2020
… r=Mark-Simulacrum BTreeMap: stop mistaking node for an orderly place A second mistake in rust-lang#77612 was to ignore the node module's rightful comment "this module doesn't care whether the entries are sorted". And there's a much simpler way to visit the keys in order, if you check this separately from a single pass checking everything. r? ````@Mark-Simulacrum````
m-ou-se
added a commit
to m-ou-se/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 7, 2020
… r=Mark-Simulacrum BTreeMap: stop mistaking node for an orderly place A second mistake in rust-lang#77612 was to ignore the node module's rightful comment "this module doesn't care whether the entries are sorted". And there's a much simpler way to visit the keys in order, if you check this separately from a single pass checking everything. r? `````@Mark-Simulacrum`````
Dylan-DPC-zz
pushed a commit
to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 8, 2020
… r=Mark-Simulacrum BTreeMap: stop mistaking node for an orderly place A second mistake in rust-lang#77612 was to ignore the node module's rightful comment "this module doesn't care whether the entries are sorted". And there's a much simpler way to visit the keys in order, if you check this separately from a single pass checking everything. r? ``````@Mark-Simulacrum``````
Dylan-DPC-zz
pushed a commit
to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 8, 2020
… r=Mark-Simulacrum BTreeMap: stop mistaking node for an orderly place A second mistake in rust-lang#77612 was to ignore the node module's rightful comment "this module doesn't care whether the entries are sorted". And there's a much simpler way to visit the keys in order, if you check this separately from a single pass checking everything. r? ```````@Mark-Simulacrum```````
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 9, 2020
Rollup of 12 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#77640 (Refactor IntErrorKind to avoid "underflow" terminology) - rust-lang#78026 (Define `fs::hard_link` to not follow symlinks.) - rust-lang#78114 (Recognize `private_intra_doc_links` as a lint) - rust-lang#78228 (Promote aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu to Tier 1) - rust-lang#78345 (Fix handling of item names for HIR) - rust-lang#78437 (BTreeMap: stop mistaking node for an orderly place) - rust-lang#78476 (fix some incorrect aliasing in the BTree) - rust-lang#78674 (inliner: Use substs_for_mir_body) - rust-lang#78748 (Implement destructuring assignment for tuples) - rust-lang#78868 (Fix tab focus on restyled switches) - rust-lang#78878 (Avoid overlapping cfg attributes when both macOS and aarch64) - rust-lang#78882 (Nicer hunk headers for rust files) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A second mistake in #77612 was to ignore the node module's rightful comment "this module doesn't care whether the entries are sorted". And there's a much simpler way to visit the keys in order, if you check this separately from a single pass checking everything.
r? @Mark-Simulacrum