Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 14 pull requests #89525

Closed
wants to merge 35 commits into from

Conversation

Manishearth
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

theo-lw and others added 30 commits August 28, 2021 21:24
Create VecDeque directly from the array instead of inserting items one-by-one.
As suggested in rust-lang#88564. This adds a `try_clone()` to `OwnedFd` by
refactoring the code out of the existing `File`/`Socket` code.
Changes doc text to refer to the "default" parameter as the "default"
function.
Co-authored-by: Ivan Tham <pickfire@riseup.net>
Enable outline-atomics by default as enabled in clang by the following commit
https://reviews.llvm.org/rGc5e7e649d537067dec7111f3de1430d0fc8a4d11

Performance improves by several orders of magnitude when using the LSE instructions
instead of the ARMv8.0 compatible load/store exclusive instructions.

Tested on Graviton2 aarch64-linux with
x.py build && x.py install && x.py test
This change makes it consistent with `Hash` for all other collections.
A subset of places referred to 'super-trait', so this changes them
to all use 'supertrait'. This matches 'supertype' and some other
usages. An exception is 'auto-trait' which is consistently used
in that manner.
…kingjubilee

[aarch64] add target feature outline-atomics

Enable outline-atomics by default as enabled in clang by the following commit
https://reviews.llvm.org/rGc5e7e649d537067dec7111f3de1430d0fc8a4d11

Performance improves by several orders of magnitude when using the LSE instructions
instead of the ARMv8.0 compatible load/store exclusive instructions.

Tested on Graviton2 aarch64-linux with
x.py build && x.py install && x.py test
…shtriplett

implement advance_(back_)_by on more iterators

Add more efficient, non-default implementations for `feature(iter_advance_by)` (rust-lang#77404) on more iterators and adapters.

This PR only contains implementations where skipping over items doesn't elide any observable side-effects such as user-provided closures or `clone()` functions. I'll put those in a separate PR.
Fix an ICE caused by type mismatch errors being ignored

This PR fixes rust-lang#87771. It turns out that the check on `compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/demand.rs:148` leads to the ICE. I removed it because the early return in [`check_expr_assign`](https://github.com/theo-lw/rust/blob/dec7fc3ced5bc3c18d0e5d29921d087f93189cb8/compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/expr.rs#L928) already prevents unnecessary error messages from the call to `check_expr_coercable_to_type`.
…u-se

VecDeque: improve performance for From<[T; N]>

Create `VecDeque` directly from the array instead of inserting items one-by-one.

Benchmark
```
./x.py bench library/alloc --test-args vec_deque::bench_from_array_1000
```

* Before
```
test vec_deque::bench_from_array_1000                    ... bench:       3,991 ns/iter (+/- 717)
```

* After
```
test vec_deque::bench_from_array_1000                    ... bench:         268 ns/iter (+/- 37)
```
…r=joshtriplett

Add a `try_clone()` function to `OwnedFd`.

As suggested in rust-lang#88564. This adds a `try_clone()` to `OwnedFd` by
refactoring the code out of the existing `File`/`Socket` code.

r? `@joshtriplett`
…x, r=dtolnay

Improve wording of `map_or_else` docs

Changes doc text to refer to the "default" parameter as the "default"
function.

Previously, the doc text referred to the "f" parameter as the "default" function; and the "default" parameter as the "fallback" function.
…avidtwco

Recommend running `cargo clean` in E0514 output

This suggestion has worked for me before. Seems to me it could help others.
Include the length in BTree hashes

This change makes it consistent with `Hash` for all other collections.
…=jyn514

rustdoc: use slice::contains instead of open-coding it
Improve error message for missing angle brackets in `[_]::method`

Fixes rust-lang#89388.
…t-usage, r=nagisa

Consistently use 'supertrait'.

A subset of places referred to 'super-trait', so this changes them
to all use 'supertrait'. This matches 'supertype' and some other
usages. An exception is 'auto-trait' which is consistently used
in that manner.
…estebank

Practice diagnostic message convention

Detected by rust-lang#89455.

r? `@estebank`
…nkov

Fix ICE with buffered lint referring to AST node deleted by everybody_loops

Fixes rust-lang#87308. Note the following comment:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/08759c691e2e9799a3c6780ffdf910240ebd4a6b/compiler/rustc_lint/src/early.rs#L415-L417

As it turns out, this is not _always_ a bug, because `-Zunpretty=everybody_loops` causes a lot of AST nodes to be deleted, and thus some buffered lints will refer to non-existent node ids. To fix this, my changes simply ignore buffered lints if `-Zunpretty=everybody_loops` is enabled, which, from my understanding, shouldn't be a big issue because it only affects pretty-printing. Of course, a more elegant solution would only ignore buffered lints that actually point at deleted node ids, but I haven't figured out an easy way of achieving this.

For the concrete example in rust-lang#87308, the buffered lint is created [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/08759c691e2e9799a3c6780ffdf910240ebd4a6b/compiler/rustc_expand/src/mbe/macro_rules.rs#L145-L151) with the `lint_node_id` from [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/08759c691e2e9799a3c6780ffdf910240ebd4a6b/compiler/rustc_expand/src/mbe/macro_rules.rs#L319), i.e. it points at the macro _expansion_, which then gets deleted by `ReplaceBodyWithLoop` [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/08759c691e2e9799a3c6780ffdf910240ebd4a6b/compiler/rustc_interface/src/passes.rs#L377).
…shtriplett

Stabilize `const_panic`

Closes rust-lang#51999

FCP completed in rust-lang#89006

`@rustbot` label +A-const-eval +A-const-fn +T-lang

cc `@oli-obk` for review (not `r?`'ing as not on lang team)
@rustbot rustbot added the rollup A PR which is a rollup label Oct 4, 2021
@Manishearth
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ p=5

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 4, 2021

📌 Commit 2914d1d has been approved by Manishearth

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Oct 4, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 4, 2021

⌛ Testing commit 2914d1d with merge fc711bbcfe303b6a138e6b999ae79a9a4c704d52...

@Manishearth
Copy link
Member Author

@bors treeclosed=4

The queue's really big, going to try and get some rollups in. Feel free to give some of the rollup=never PRs higher priority if necessary, or reopen the tree if I end up not being super responsive (you can ping me on Zulip or Discord).

@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job dist-various-2 failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

error[E0432]: unresolved import `crate::sys::cvt`
  --> library/std/src/os/fd/owned.rs:11:5
   |
11 | use crate::sys::cvt;
   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ no `cvt` in `sys`

error[E0425]: cannot find value `F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC` in crate `libc`
    |
    |
79  |         let cmd = libc::F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC;
    |                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: a constant with a similar name exists: `FD_CLOEXEC`
   ::: /cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/libc-0.2.99/src/wasi.rs:188:1
    |
    |
188 | pub const FD_CLOEXEC: c_int = 1;
    | -------------------------------- similarly named constant `FD_CLOEXEC` defined here
Some errors have detailed explanations: E0425, E0432.
For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0425`.
[RUSTC-TIMING] std test:false 2.389
warning: `std` (lib) generated 1 warning

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 4, 2021

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Oct 4, 2021
@nbdd0121
Copy link
Contributor

nbdd0121 commented Oct 4, 2021

Caused by #88794

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet