Rollup of 6 pull requests #91799
Merged
Rollup of 6 pull requests #91799
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This commit also updates `stdarch` git submodule.
This is a follow-up from rust-lang#91645, regarding [some remarks I made](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/187312-wg-async-foundations/topic/join!/near/264293660). Mainly: - it hides the recursive munching through a private `macro`, to avoid leaking such details (a corollary is getting rid of the need to use `@` to disambiguate); - it uses a `match` binding, _outside_ the `async move` block, to better match the semantics from function-like syntax; - it pre-pins the future before calling into `poll_fn`, since `poll_fn`, alone, cannot guarantee that its capture does not move; - it uses `.ready()?` since it's such a neat pattern; - it renames `Took` to `Taken` for consistency with `Done`.
Co-Authored-By: Ibraheem Ahmed <ibrah1440@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ibraheem Ahmed <ibrah1440@gmail.com>
…` point
```
error[E0759]: `self` has an anonymous lifetime `'_` but it needs to satisfy a `'static` lifetime requirement
--> $DIR/issue-72312.rs:10:24
|
LL | pub async fn start(&self) {
| ^^^^^ this data with an anonymous lifetime `'_`...
...
LL | require_static(async move {
| -------------- ...is required to live as long as `'static` here...
LL | &self;
| ----- ...and is captured here
|
note: `'static` lifetime requirement introduced by this trait bound
--> $DIR/issue-72312.rs:2:22
|
LL | fn require_static<T: 'static>(val: T) -> T {
| ^^^^^^^
error: aborting due to previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0759`.
```
Fix rust-lang#72312.
* take diagnostic logic out of happy-path * sort/dedup once * add more comments
More accurate filtering still needed.
Co-authored-by: Daniel Henry-Mantilla <daniel.henry.mantilla@gmail.com>
In Rust, nesting method calls with both require `&mut` access to `self`
produces a borrow-check error:
error[E0499]: cannot borrow `*self` as mutable more than once at a time
--> src/lib.rs:7:14
|
7 | self.foo(self.bar());
| ---------^^^^^^^^^^-
| | | |
| | | second mutable borrow occurs here
| | first borrow later used by call
| first mutable borrow occurs here
That's because Rust has a left-to-right evaluation order, and the method
receiver is passed first. Thus, the argument to the method cannot then
mutate `self`.
There's an easy solution to this error: just extract a local variable
for the inner argument:
let tmp = self.bar();
self.foo(tmp);
However, the error doesn't give any suggestion of how to solve the
problem. As a result, new users may assume that it's impossible to
express their code correctly and get stuck.
This commit adds a (non-structured) suggestion to extract a local
variable for the inner argument to solve the error. The suggestion uses
heuristics that eliminate most false positives, though there are a few
false negatives (cases where the suggestion should be emitted but is
not). Those other cases can be implemented in a future change.
Suggest using a temporary variable to fix borrowck errors Fixes rust-lang#77834. In Rust, nesting method calls with both require `&mut` access to `self` produces a borrow-check error: error[E0499]: cannot borrow `*self` as mutable more than once at a time --> src/lib.rs:7:14 | 7 | self.foo(self.bar()); | ---------^^^^^^^^^^- | | | | | | | second mutable borrow occurs here | | first borrow later used by call | first mutable borrow occurs here That's because Rust has a left-to-right evaluation order, and the method receiver is passed first. Thus, the argument to the method cannot then mutate `self`. There's an easy solution to this error: just extract a local variable for the inner argument: let tmp = self.bar(); self.foo(tmp); However, the error doesn't give any suggestion of how to solve the problem. As a result, new users may assume that it's impossible to express their code correctly and get stuck. This commit adds a (non-structured) suggestion to extract a local variable for the inner argument to solve the error. The suggestion uses heuristics that eliminate most false positives, though there are a few false negatives (cases where the suggestion should be emitted but is not). Those other cases can be implemented in a future change.
Point at capture points for non-`'static` reference crossing a `yield` point
```
error[E0759]: `self` has an anonymous lifetime `'_` but it needs to satisfy a `'static` lifetime requirement
--> $DIR/issue-72312.rs:10:24
|
LL | pub async fn start(&self) {
| ^^^^^ this data with an anonymous lifetime `'_`...
...
LL | require_static(async move {
| -------------- ...is required to live as long as `'static` here...
LL | &self;
| ----- ...and is captured here
|
note: `'static` lifetime requirement introduced by this trait bound
--> $DIR/issue-72312.rs:2:22
|
LL | fn require_static<T: 'static>(val: T) -> T {
| ^^^^^^^
error: aborting due to previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0759`.
```
Fix rust-lang#72312.
Make `Borrow` and `BorrowMut` impls `const` Tracking issue: rust-lang#91522
Const `Option::cloned` This constifies the two `Option::cloned` functions, bounded on `~const Clone`.
…anieu Add spin_loop hint for RISC-V architecture This commit uses the PAUSE instruction (rust-lang/stdarch#1262) to implement RISC-V spin loop, and updates `stdarch` submodule to use the merged PAUSE instruction.
…triplett Minor improvements to `future::join!`'s implementation This is a follow-up from rust-lang#91645, regarding [some remarks I made](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/187312-wg-async-foundations/topic/join!/near/264293660). Mainly: - it hides the recursive munching through a private `macro`, to avoid leaking such details (a corollary is getting rid of the need to use ``@`` to disambiguate); - it uses a `match` binding, _outside_ the `async move` block, to better match the semantics from function-like syntax; - it pre-pins the future before calling into `poll_fn`, since `poll_fn`, alone, cannot guarantee that its capture does not move (to clarify: I believe the previous code was sound, thanks to the outer layer of `async`. But I find it clearer / more robust to refactorings this way 🙂). - it uses `@ibraheemdev's` very neat `.ready()?`; - it renames `Took` to `Taken` for consistency with `Done` (tiny nit 😄). ~~TODO~~Done: - [x] Add unit tests to enforce the function-like `:value` semantics are respected. r? `@nrc`
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=6 |
|
📌 Commit ed81098 has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
Finished benchmarking commit (928783d): comparison url. Summary: This change led to very large relevant mixed results 🤷 in compiler performance.
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
'staticreference crossing ayieldpoint #89734 (Point at capture points for non-'staticreference crossing ayieldpoint)BorrowandBorrowMutimplsconst#90270 (MakeBorrowandBorrowMutimplsconst)Option::cloned#90741 (ConstOption::cloned)future::join!'s implementation #91721 (Minor improvements tofuture::join!'s implementation)Failed merges:
r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup