Fix CVE-2022-21658 #93112
Merged
Fix CVE-2022-21658 #93112
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@bors r+ p=250 |
|
📌 Commit 32080ad has been approved by |
bors
added
the
S-waiting-on-bors
|
@bors r+ p=250 |
|
📌 Commit 0a6c9ad has been approved by |
|
🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 600. This pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened. |
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 20, 2022
…askrgr Rollup of 13 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#89747 (Add MaybeUninit::(slice_)as_bytes(_mut)) - rust-lang#89764 (Fix variant index / discriminant confusion in uninhabited enum branching) - rust-lang#91606 (Stabilize `-Z print-link-args` as `--print link-args`) - rust-lang#91694 (rustdoc: decouple stability and const-stability) - rust-lang#92183 (Point at correct argument when async fn output type lifetime disagrees with signature) - rust-lang#92582 (improve `_` constants in item signature handling) - rust-lang#92680 (intra-doc: Use the impl's assoc item where possible) - rust-lang#92704 (Change lint message to be stronger for &T -> &mut T transmute) - rust-lang#92861 (Rustdoc mobile: put out-of-band info on its own line) - rust-lang#92992 (Help optimize out backtraces when disabled) - rust-lang#93038 (Fix star handling in block doc comments) - rust-lang#93108 (:arrow_up: rust-analyzer) - rust-lang#93112 (Fix CVE-2022-21658) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
sunfishcode
added a commit
to bytecodealliance/cap-std
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 20, 2022
Port the fix from rust-lang/rust#93112 to cap-std.
sunfishcode
added a commit
to bytecodealliance/cap-std
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 21, 2022
Port the fix from rust-lang/rust#93112 to cap-std.
seritools
added a commit
to rust9x/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 29, 2023
The recursive directory removal implementation falls back to the old one if the necessary APIs are not available (`NtCreateFile`, `GetFileInformationByHandleEx`, `SetFileInformationByHandle`). The APIs are available on Vista/Server 2008. See notes on `fileextd.lib` above to extend the support to Windows XP/Server 2003. **This might cause security issues**, see rust-lang#93112
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See https://blog.rust-lang.org/2022/01/20/cve-2022-21658.html. Patches reviewed by @m-ou-se.
r? @ghost