Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 7 pull requests #94148

Merged
merged 21 commits into from
Feb 19, 2022
Merged

Rollup of 7 pull requests #94148

merged 21 commits into from
Feb 19, 2022

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

Charisee and others added 21 commits February 10, 2022 21:52
Signed-off-by: Alex Saveau <saveau.alexandre@gmail.com>
to avoid panic for invalid Unicode scalar values
Improve the documentation of drain members

hopefully fixes rust-lang#92765
…imulacrum

rustdoc-json: buffer output

It turns out we were doing syscalls for each part of the json syntax

Before:
```
...
[pid 1801267] write(5, "\"", 1)         = 1
[pid 1801267] write(5, ",", 1)          = 1
[pid 1801267] write(5, "\"", 1)         = 1
...
```

After:

```
[pid 1974821] write(5, "{\"root\":\"0:0\",\"crate_version\":nu"..., 1575) = 1575
```

In one benchmark (one struct, almost all time in `std`), this gives ~2x perf

r? `@CraftSpider`

`@rustbot` modify labels: +A-rustdoc-json +T-rustdoc -A-testsuite
Add debug assertions to validate NUL terminator in c strings

The `unchecked` variants from the stdlib usually perform the check anyway if debug assertions are on (for example, `unwrap_unchecked`). This PR does the same thing for `CStr` and `CString`, validating the correctness for the NUL byte in debug mode.
pre rust-lang#89862 cleanup

changes used in rust-lang#89862 which can be landed without the rest of this PR being finished.

r? `@estebank`
Use a `Field` in `ConstraintCategory::ClosureUpvar`

As part of rust-lang#90317, we do not want `HirId` to implement `Ord`, `PartialOrd`. This line of code has made that difficult

https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1b27144afc77031ba9c05d86c06c64485589775a/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/region_infer/mod.rs#L2184

since it sorts a [`ConstraintCategory::ClosureUpvar(HirId)`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_middle/mir/enum.ConstraintCategory.html#variant.ClosureUpvar).

This PR makes that variant take a [`Field`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_middle/mir/struct.Field.html) instead.

r? `@nikomatsakis`
…=davidtwco

Fix ScalarInt to char conversion

to avoid panic for invalid Unicode scalar values
@rustbot rustbot added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Feb 19, 2022
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=7

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 19, 2022

📌 Commit 5a083db has been approved by matthiaskrgr

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Feb 19, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 19, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 5a083db with merge 3eff72ca75f434a7c0ce866a203b91af7f325f95...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 19, 2022

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Feb 19, 2022
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors retry no output from dist-aarch64-apple

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 19, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 19, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 5a083db with merge e08d569...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 19, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing e08d569 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Feb 19, 2022
@bors bors merged commit e08d569 into rust-lang:master Feb 19, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.60.0 milestone Feb 19, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (e08d569): comparison url.

Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant results.

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-jgea68f branch March 11, 2022 15:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet