bump tracing version #98626

oli-obk · 2022-06-28T15:19:44Z

Bump tracing dependency to 0.1.35 to give us features like printing the return value of functions

rust-highfive · 2022-06-28T15:19:50Z

r? @michaelwoerister

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

rustbot · 2022-06-28T15:19:50Z

Some changes occurred to the CTFE / Miri engine

cc @rust-lang/miri

RalfJung · 2022-06-28T15:26:14Z

compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/intern.rs

@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ pub enum InternKind {
 /// tracks where in the value we are and thus can show much better error messages.
 /// Any errors here would anyway be turned into `const_err` lints, whereas validation failures
 /// are hard errors.
-#[tracing::instrument(level = "debug", skip(ecx))]
+#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(ecx))]


I'd prefer if the tracing in the interpreter used the trace level. Currently we make debug already so drowned in noise that we basically lose the entire point of even having that distinction.

This is just for keeping the previous thing. I would like for the default to be trace and then opt in a few to debug

lcnr · 2022-06-29T09:00:26Z

compiler/rustc_query_impl/src/plumbing.rs

@@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ macro_rules! define_queries_struct {

            $($(#[$attr])*
            #[inline(always)]
-            #[tracing::instrument(level = "trace", skip(self, tcx))]
+            #[tracing::instrument(level = "trace", skip(self, tcx), ret)]


Suggested change

#[tracing::instrument(level = "trace", skip(self, tcx), ret)]

#[instrument(level = "trace", skip(self, tcx), ret)]

does that work?

nope, the macro is invoked $somewhere else, and it's weird to have to add an import at the call site in order for the macro expansion to compile

lcnr · 2022-06-29T09:01:13Z

compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/fold.rs

            ControlFlow::Break(FoundFlags)
        } else {
            ControlFlow::CONTINUE
        }
    }

    #[inline]
-    #[instrument(level = "trace")]
+    #[instrument(skip(self), level = "trace", ret)]
    fn visit_const(&mut self, c: ty::Const<'tcx>) -> ControlFlow<Self::BreakTy> {
        let flags = FlagComputation::for_const(c);
        trace!(r.flags=?flags);


Suggested change

trace!(r.flags=?flags);

trace!(c.flags=?flags);

lcnr · 2022-06-29T09:06:31Z

small nits, then r=me

r? @lcnr

lcnr · 2022-06-29T09:10:12Z

@bors try @rust-timer queue

probably won't negatively impact perf, but better to be sure

rust-timer · 2022-06-29T09:10:14Z

Awaiting bors try build completion.

@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf

bors · 2022-06-29T09:10:26Z

⌛ Trying commit d8dd65118a3e14df8ec1a9bf4e9389519f369d86 with merge 341e73079846b165ae541bfce020672a57c7ff78...

bors · 2022-06-29T11:08:13Z

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 341e73079846b165ae541bfce020672a57c7ff78 (341e73079846b165ae541bfce020672a57c7ff78)

rust-timer · 2022-06-29T11:08:16Z

Queued 341e73079846b165ae541bfce020672a57c7ff78 with parent 493c960, future comparison URL.

rust-timer · 2022-06-29T17:40:12Z

Finished benchmarking commit (341e73079846b165ae541bfce020672a57c7ff78): comparison url.

Instruction count

Primary benchmarks: mixed results
Secondary benchmarks: mixed results

	mean¹	max	count²
Regressions 😿 (primary)	1.7%	1.9%	2
Regressions 😿 (secondary)	2.9%	4.7%	9
Improvements 🎉 (primary)	-0.4%	-0.5%	13
Improvements 🎉 (secondary)	-0.9%	-2.0%	14
All 😿🎉 (primary)	-0.1%	1.9%	15

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

Primary benchmarks: 😿 relevant regression found
Secondary benchmarks: mixed results

	mean¹	max	count²
Regressions 😿 (primary)	2.3%	2.3%	1
Regressions 😿 (secondary)	2.1%	2.1%	1
Improvements 🎉 (primary)	N/A	N/A	0
Improvements 🎉 (secondary)	-2.2%	-2.2%	1
All 😿🎉 (primary)	2.3%	2.3%	1

Cycles

Results

Primary benchmarks: no relevant changes found
Secondary benchmarks: mixed results

	mean¹	max	count²
Regressions 😿 (primary)	N/A	N/A	0
Regressions 😿 (secondary)	2.2%	2.2%	1
Improvements 🎉 (primary)	N/A	N/A	0
Improvements 🎉 (secondary)	-2.4%	-2.5%	2
All 😿🎉 (primary)	N/A	N/A	0

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If the next run shows neutral or positive results, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

the arithmetic mean of the percent change ↩ ↩² ↩³
number of relevant changes ↩ ↩² ↩³

oli-obk · 2022-06-30T08:57:56Z

both the keccak and the cranelift regression seem to be

<ObligationForest<PendingPredicateObligation>>::process_obligations::<FulfillProcessor, Outcome<PendingPredicateObligation, FulfillmentErrorCode>>

seems like the ret does affect some inlining decisions after all

oli-obk · 2022-06-30T09:17:37Z

@bors try @rust-timer queue include=cranelift,keccak

rust-timer · 2022-06-30T09:17:41Z

Awaiting bors try build completion.

@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf

bors · 2022-06-30T09:17:47Z

⌛ Trying commit c7f5245e6ed0f142d33ca6d7ba747ebeee3c37fd with merge 7b2a49496c07afd88c5fc948d16d2557d78a9b3a...

bors · 2022-06-30T10:47:36Z

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 7b2a49496c07afd88c5fc948d16d2557d78a9b3a (7b2a49496c07afd88c5fc948d16d2557d78a9b3a)

rust-timer · 2022-06-30T10:47:40Z

Queued 7b2a49496c07afd88c5fc948d16d2557d78a9b3a with parent a9eb9c5, future comparison URL.

…nstrument path

oli-obk · 2022-07-29T15:43:50Z

@bors try @rust-timer queue

rust-timer · 2022-07-29T15:43:52Z

Awaiting bors try build completion.

@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf

bors · 2022-07-29T15:44:00Z

⌛ Trying commit a4375cb with merge dfe07b2522d238f735a246a7434d284316bf2749...

bors · 2022-07-29T17:37:18Z

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: dfe07b2522d238f735a246a7434d284316bf2749 (dfe07b2522d238f735a246a7434d284316bf2749)

rust-timer · 2022-07-29T17:37:20Z

Queued dfe07b2522d238f735a246a7434d284316bf2749 with parent 9fa62f2, future comparison URL.

rust-timer · 2022-07-29T19:53:24Z

Finished benchmarking commit (dfe07b2522d238f735a246a7434d284316bf2749): comparison url.

Instruction count

Primary benchmarks: no relevant changes found
Secondary benchmarks: mixed results

	mean¹	max	count²
Regressions 😿 (primary)	N/A	N/A	0
Regressions 😿 (secondary)	1.1%	1.4%	8
Improvements 🎉 (primary)	N/A	N/A	0
Improvements 🎉 (secondary)	-0.3%	-0.3%	17
All 😿🎉 (primary)	N/A	N/A	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

Primary benchmarks: no relevant changes found
Secondary benchmarks: 😿 relevant regressions found

	mean¹	max	count²
Regressions 😿 (primary)	N/A	N/A	0
Regressions 😿 (secondary)	3.0%	3.7%	3
Improvements 🎉 (primary)	N/A	N/A	0
Improvements 🎉 (secondary)	N/A	N/A	0
All 😿🎉 (primary)	N/A	N/A	0

Cycles

Results

Primary benchmarks: no relevant changes found
Secondary benchmarks: mixed results

	mean¹	max	count²
Regressions 😿 (primary)	N/A	N/A	0
Regressions 😿 (secondary)	3.8%	5.3%	3
Improvements 🎉 (primary)	N/A	N/A	0
Improvements 🎉 (secondary)	-5.3%	-5.8%	3
All 😿🎉 (primary)	N/A	N/A	0

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If the next run shows neutral or positive results, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-review -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

the arithmetic mean of the percent change ↩ ↩² ↩³
number of relevant changes ↩ ↩² ↩³

apiraino · 2022-08-04T11:07:59Z

If it's ok, I'll switch back on author for a comment on the latest perf run (PR itself is already r'ed).

@rustbot author

oli-obk · 2022-08-24T16:29:32Z

no clue what happened here, but maybe we should just take the perf hit until tracing figures out how to make #[instrument] literally be a nop instead of always creating a "trivially inlineable" function that still consumes inlining fuel in LLVM

 66,326,322  ???:<rustc_middle::ty::fold::RegionFolder as rustc_middle::ty::fold::FallibleTypeFolder>::try_fold_ty
-54,806,907  ???:<rustc_middle::ty::Ty as rustc_middle::ty::fold::TypeSuperFoldable>::super_fold_with::<rustc_middle::ty::fold::RegionFolder>
 27,816,815  ???:<rustc_middle::ty::fold::RegionFolder as rustc_middle::ty::fold::TypeFolder>::fold_ty
-23,058,283  ???:<rustc_middle::ty::Ty as rustc_middle::ty::fold::TypeSuperFoldable>::super_fold_with::<rustc_borrowck::region_infer::opaque_types::ReverseMapper>
 14,925,063  ???:<rustc_borrowck::region_infer::opaque_types::ReverseMapper as rustc_middle::ty::fold::TypeFolder>::fold_ty
-14,151,962  ???:rustc_middle::ty::util::fold_list::<rustc_middle::ty::fold::RegionFolder, rustc_middle::ty::Ty, <&rustc_middle::ty::list::List<rustc_middle::ty::Ty> as rustc_middle::ty::fold::TypeFoldable>::try_fold_with<rustc_middle::ty::fold::RegionFolder>::{closure
 10,735,356  ???:<&rustc_middle::ty::list::List<rustc_middle::ty::Ty> as rustc_middle::ty::fold::TypeFoldable>::try_fold_with::<rustc_middle::ty::fold::RegionFolder>
 -7,081,191  ???:rustc_middle::ty::util::fold_list::<rustc_borrowck::region_infer::opaque_types::ReverseMapper, rustc_middle::ty::Ty, <&rustc_middle::ty::list::List<rustc_middle::ty::Ty> as rustc_middle::ty::fold::TypeFoldable>::try_fold_with<rustc_borrowck::region_infer::opaque_types::ReverseMapper>::{closure
  6,362,614  ???:<&rustc_middle::ty::list::List<rustc_middle::ty::subst::GenericArg> as rustc_middle::ty::fold::TypeFoldable>::try_fold_with::<rustc_middle::ty::fold::RegionFolder>
  6,229,682  ???:<rustc_infer::infer::nll_relate::TypeGeneralizer<rustc_borrowck::type_check::relate_tys::NllTypeRelatingDelegate> as rustc_middle::ty::relate::TypeRelation>::relate_with_variance::<rustc_middle::ty::subst::GenericArg>
 -5,967,390  ???:core::iter::adapters::try_process::<core::iter::adapters::map::Map<core::iter::adapters::zip::Zip<core::iter::adapters::copied::Copied<core::slice::iter::Iter<rustc_middle::ty::subst::GenericArg>>, core::iter::adapters::copied::Copied<core::slice::iter::Iter<rustc_middle::ty::subst::GenericArg>>>, rustc_middle::ty::relate::relate_substs<rustc_infer::infer::nll_relate::TypeGeneralizer<rustc_borrowck::type_check::relate_tys::NllTypeRelatingDelegate>>::{closure
  5,114,388  ???:<&rustc_middle::ty::list::List<rustc_middle::ty::Ty> as rustc_middle::ty::fold::TypeFoldable>::try_fold_with::<rustc_borrowck::region_infer::opaque_types::ReverseMapper>
 -5,048,914  ???:rustc_middle::ty::util::fold_list::<rustc_middle::ty::fold::RegionFolder, rustc_middle::ty::subst::GenericArg, <&rustc_middle::ty::list::List<rustc_middle::ty::subst::GenericArg> as rustc_middle::ty::fold::TypeFoldable>::try_fold_with<rustc_middle::ty::fold::RegionFolder>::{closure
  4,983,754  ???:<smallvec::SmallVec<[rustc_middle::ty::subst::GenericArg; 8]> as core::iter::traits::collect::Extend<rustc_middle::ty::subst::GenericArg>>::extend::<core::iter::adapters::GenericShunt<core::iter::adapters::map::Map<core::iter::adapters::zip::Zip<core::iter::adapters::copied::Copied<core::slice::iter::Iter<rustc_middle::ty::subst::GenericArg>>, core::iter::adapters::copied::Copied<core::slice::iter::Iter<rustc_middle::ty::subst::GenericArg>>>, rustc_middle::ty::relate::relate_substs<rustc_infer::infer::nll_relate::TypeGeneralizer<rustc_borrowck::type_check::relate_tys::NllTypeRelatingDelegate>>::{closure
 -4,458,532  ???:core::iter::adapters::try_process::<core::iter::adapters::map::Map<core::iter::adapters::zip::Zip<core::iter::adapters::copied::Copied<core::slice::iter::Iter<rustc_middle::ty::Ty>>, core::iter::adapters::copied::Copied<core::slice::iter::Iter<rustc_middle::ty::Ty>>>, <rustc_middle::ty::relate::GeneratorWitness as rustc_middle::ty::relate::Relate>::relate<rustc_infer::infer::nll_relate::TypeGeneralizer<rustc_borrowck::type_check::relate_tys::NllTypeRelatingDelegate>>::{closure
  3,868,486  ???:<smallvec::SmallVec<[rustc_middle::ty::Ty; 8]> as core::iter::traits::collect::Extend<rustc_middle::ty::Ty>>::extend::<core::iter::adapters::GenericShunt<core::iter::adapters::map::Map<core::iter::adapters::zip::Zip<core::iter::adapters::copied::Copied<core::slice::iter::Iter<rustc_middle::ty::Ty>>, core::iter::adapters::copied::Copied<core::slice::iter::Iter<rustc_middle::ty::Ty>>>, <rustc_middle::ty::relate::GeneratorWitness as rustc_middle::ty::relate::Relate>::relate<rustc_infer::infer::nll_relate::TypeGeneralizer<rustc_borrowck::type_check::relate_tys::NllTypeRelatingDelegate>>::{closure
  1,835,880  ???:<core::iter::adapters::GenericShunt<core::iter::adapters::map::Map<core::iter::adapters::zip::Zip<core::iter::adapters::copied::Copied<core::slice::iter::Iter<rustc_middle::ty::Ty>>, core::iter::adapters::copied::Copied<core::slice::iter::Iter<rustc_middle::ty::Ty>>>, <rustc_middle::ty::relate::GeneratorWitness as rustc_middle::ty::relate::Relate>::relate<rustc_infer::infer::nll_relate::TypeGeneralizer<rustc_borrowck::type_check::relate_tys::NllTypeRelatingDelegate>>::{closure
  1,803,285  ???:<rustc_middle::ty::subst::GenericArg as rustc_middle::ty::fold::TypeFoldable>::fold_with::<rustc_borrowck::region_infer::opaque_types::ReverseMapper>
 -1,803,285  ???:<rustc_middle::ty::subst::GenericArg as rustc_middle::ty::fold::TypeFoldable>::try_fold_with::<rustc_borrowck::region_infer::opaque_types::ReverseMapper>
  1,309,944  ???:<rustc_middle::ty::subst::GenericArg as rustc_middle::ty::fold::TypeFoldable>::try_fold_with::<rustc_middle::ty::fold::RegionFolder>
 -1,305,124  ???:<rustc_middle::ty::Ty as rustc_middle::ty::fold::TypeFoldable>::fold_with::<rustc_middle::ty::fold::RegionFolder>

lcnr · 2022-08-29T07:32:01Z

while unfortunate, I am fine with that 👍

r=me after updating the PR description (or actually adding the rest of your work back in 😁)

oli-obk · 2022-08-29T08:39:49Z

@bors r=lcnr

bors · 2022-08-29T08:39:51Z

📌 Commit a4375cb has been approved by lcnr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

bors · 2022-08-29T11:13:45Z

⌛ Testing commit a4375cb with merge b96fa1a...

bors · 2022-08-29T13:54:49Z

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: lcnr
Pushing b96fa1a to master...

rust-timer · 2022-08-29T15:31:12Z

Finished benchmarking commit (b96fa1a): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean¹	range	count²
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.2%	[-1.2%, -1.2%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean¹	range	count²
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-2.5%	[-2.5%, -2.5%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-2.5%	[-2.5%, -2.5%]	1

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean¹	range	count²
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	4.1%	[4.1%, 4.1%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-5.4%	[-5.4%, -5.4%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-5.4%	[-5.4%, -5.4%]	1

the arithmetic mean of the percent change ↩ ↩² ↩³
number of relevant changes ↩ ↩² ↩³

rust-highfive assigned michaelwoerister Jun 28, 2022

rustbot added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jun 28, 2022

rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jun 28, 2022

RalfJung reviewed Jun 28, 2022

View reviewed changes

lcnr reviewed Jun 29, 2022

View reviewed changes

rust-highfive assigned lcnr and unassigned michaelwoerister Jun 29, 2022

rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jun 29, 2022

rustbot added perf-regression Performance regression. and removed S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. labels Jun 29, 2022

oli-obk force-pushed the tracing branch from ab3bc4e to c7f5245 Compare June 30, 2022 09:17

rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jun 30, 2022

oli-obk added 2 commits July 29, 2022 15:41

never inline the only thing that calls a query, which could hit the i…

92bc9db

…nstrument path

Bump tracing to 0.1.35

a4375cb

oli-obk force-pushed the tracing branch from 2938785 to a4375cb Compare July 29, 2022 15:43

rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jul 29, 2022

bors mentioned this pull request Jul 29, 2022

Add Fuchsia platform support documentation #99831

Merged

rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Jul 29, 2022

rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 4, 2022

oli-obk changed the title ~~tracing::instrument cleanup~~ bump tracing version Aug 29, 2022

bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Aug 29, 2022

bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Aug 29, 2022

bors merged commit b96fa1a into rust-lang:master Aug 29, 2022

rustbot added this to the 1.65.0 milestone Aug 29, 2022

rustbot removed the perf-regression Performance regression. label Aug 29, 2022

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

bump tracing version #98626

bump tracing version #98626

oli-obk commented Jun 28, 2022 •

edited

rust-highfive commented Jun 28, 2022

rustbot commented Jun 28, 2022

RalfJung Jun 28, 2022

oli-obk Jun 28, 2022

lcnr Jun 29, 2022

oli-obk Jun 30, 2022

lcnr Jun 29, 2022

lcnr commented Jun 29, 2022

lcnr commented Jun 29, 2022

rust-timer commented Jun 29, 2022

bors commented Jun 29, 2022

bors commented Jun 29, 2022

rust-timer commented Jun 29, 2022

rust-timer commented Jun 29, 2022

oli-obk commented Jun 30, 2022

oli-obk commented Jun 30, 2022

rust-timer commented Jun 30, 2022

bors commented Jun 30, 2022

bors commented Jun 30, 2022

rust-timer commented Jun 30, 2022

oli-obk commented Jul 29, 2022

rust-timer commented Jul 29, 2022

bors commented Jul 29, 2022

bors commented Jul 29, 2022

rust-timer commented Jul 29, 2022

rust-timer commented Jul 29, 2022

apiraino commented Aug 4, 2022

oli-obk commented Aug 24, 2022

lcnr commented Aug 29, 2022

oli-obk commented Aug 29, 2022

bors commented Aug 29, 2022

bors commented Aug 29, 2022

bors commented Aug 29, 2022

rust-timer commented Aug 29, 2022

	#[tracing::instrument(level = "trace", skip(self, tcx), ret)]
	#[instrument(level = "trace", skip(self, tcx), ret)]

bump tracing version #98626

bump tracing version #98626

Conversation

oli-obk commented Jun 28, 2022 • edited

rust-highfive commented Jun 28, 2022

rustbot commented Jun 28, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

lcnr commented Jun 29, 2022

lcnr commented Jun 29, 2022

rust-timer commented Jun 29, 2022

bors commented Jun 29, 2022

bors commented Jun 29, 2022

rust-timer commented Jun 29, 2022

rust-timer commented Jun 29, 2022

Footnotes

oli-obk commented Jun 30, 2022

oli-obk commented Jun 30, 2022

rust-timer commented Jun 30, 2022

bors commented Jun 30, 2022

bors commented Jun 30, 2022

rust-timer commented Jun 30, 2022

oli-obk commented Jul 29, 2022

rust-timer commented Jul 29, 2022

bors commented Jul 29, 2022

bors commented Jul 29, 2022

rust-timer commented Jul 29, 2022

rust-timer commented Jul 29, 2022

Footnotes

apiraino commented Aug 4, 2022

oli-obk commented Aug 24, 2022

lcnr commented Aug 29, 2022

oli-obk commented Aug 29, 2022

bors commented Aug 29, 2022

bors commented Aug 29, 2022

bors commented Aug 29, 2022

rust-timer commented Aug 29, 2022

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Footnotes

oli-obk commented Jun 28, 2022 •

edited