Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 6 pull requests #99177

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Jul 12, 2022
Merged

Rollup of 6 pull requests #99177

merged 17 commits into from
Jul 12, 2022

Conversation

Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

TaKO8Ki and others added 17 commits July 6, 2022 20:09
Also change `executables` to true for linux-kernel and windows-uwp-gnu targets
rustc_target: Flip the default for `TargetOptions::executables` to true

This flag is true for most targets and the remaining targets may be mistakes.
…stebank

Fix last `let_chains` blocker

In order to forbid things like `let x = (let y = 1);` or `if let a = 1 && { let x = let y = 1; } {}`, the parser **HAS** to know the context of `let`.

This context thing is not a surprise in the parser because you can see **a lot** of ad hoc fixes mixing parsing logic with validation logic creating code that looks more like spaghetti with tomato sauce.

To make things even greater, a new ad hoc fix was added to only allow `let`s in a valid `let_chains` context by checking the previously processed token. This was the only solution I could think of and believe me, I thought about it for a long time 👍

In the long term, it should be preferable to segregate different responsibilities or create a more robust and cleaner parser framework.

cc rust-lang#94927
cc rust-lang#53667
…-to-floating-point-number, r=compiler-errors

Suggest adding a missing zero to a floating point number

fixes rust-lang#98836
Some more `EarlyBinder` cleanups

First commit has a couple unrelated cleanups, but otherwise each commit is self-explanatory

r? rust-lang/types
use PlaceRef::iter_projections to fix old FIXME

I added this function in 53481a5
…x, r=Dylan-DPC

Put back UI test regex

I just realized I overwrote these two commits in rust-lang#99055 when force pushing to fix the stdout output...

r? `@Dylan-DPC`
@rustbot rustbot added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Jul 12, 2022
@Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 12, 2022

📌 Commit 87e25e4 has been approved by Dylan-DPC

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Jul 12, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 12, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 87e25e4 with merge 1c7b36d...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 12, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Dylan-DPC
Pushing 1c7b36d to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jul 12, 2022
@bors bors merged commit 1c7b36d into rust-lang:master Jul 12, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.64.0 milestone Jul 12, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (1c7b36d): comparison url.

Instruction count

  • Primary benchmarks: no relevant changes found
  • Secondary benchmarks: 😿 relevant regressions found
mean1 max count2
Regressions 😿
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
0.5% 0.6% 9
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
N/A N/A 0
All 😿🎉 (primary) N/A N/A 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results
  • Primary benchmarks: 🎉 relevant improvement found
  • Secondary benchmarks: mixed results
mean1 max count2
Regressions 😿
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
4.9% 4.9% 1
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
-3.6% -3.6% 1
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
-2.1% -2.1% 1
All 😿🎉 (primary) -3.6% -3.6% 1

Cycles

Results
  • Primary benchmarks: 😿 relevant regression found
  • Secondary benchmarks: 😿 relevant regression found
mean1 max count2
Regressions 😿
(primary)
2.6% 2.6% 1
Regressions 😿
(secondary)
2.2% 2.2% 1
Improvements 🎉
(primary)
N/A N/A 0
Improvements 🎉
(secondary)
N/A N/A 0
All 😿🎉 (primary) 2.6% 2.6% 1

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please open an issue or create a new PR that fixes the regressions, add a comment linking to the newly created issue or PR, and then add the perf-regression-triaged label to this PR.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression

Footnotes

  1. the arithmetic mean of the percent change 2 3

  2. number of relevant changes 2 3

@rustbot rustbot added the perf-regression Performance regression. label Jul 12, 2022
@rylev
Copy link
Member

rylev commented Jul 19, 2022

Relatively small regression in secondary benchmarks. Nothing stands out as an obvious culprit, so we can mark as triaged.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged

@rustbot rustbot added the perf-regression-triaged The performance regression has been triaged. label Jul 19, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. perf-regression Performance regression. perf-regression-triaged The performance regression has been triaged. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet