Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Use direct ops in Rem<T> for Complex<T> #25

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 21, 2018
Merged

Use direct ops in Rem<T> for Complex<T> #25

merged 1 commit into from
May 21, 2018

Commits on May 21, 2018

  1. Use direct ops in Rem<T> for Complex<T> 

    This avoids overflow issues with dividing by `norm_sqr`, and is
probably faster too, just for being simpler.
    @cuviper
    cuviper committed May 21, 2018
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    b6ad659 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history