Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

StepRng: better documentation of outputs for other types #1304

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 26, 2023

Conversation

dhardy
Copy link
Member

@dhardy dhardy commented Mar 23, 2023

Closes #1303.

@WarrenWeckesser can you review please?

/// Output values may not be intuitive and may change in future releases but
/// are considered
/// [portable](https://rust-random.github.io/book/portability.html).
/// (`bool` output is true when bit `1u64 << 31` is set.)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

just want to be sure, it is 1u64 << 31 for any endianness / arch ?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes.

Copy link
Collaborator

@WarrenWeckesser WarrenWeckesser left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@dhardy dhardy merged commit c6cca9c into rust-random:master Mar 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

StepRng almost always produces bool false
3 participants