chore(deps): update actions/checkout digest to 692973e

[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
actions/checkout	action	digest	a5ac7e5 -> 692973e

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

---

Tip

Early access features

• OpenAI gpt-4o model for reviews and chat.

Note:

• You can disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by setting early_access: false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.
• Please join our Discord Community to provide feedback and report issues.
• OSS projects are always opted into early access features.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[deepsource-io]

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 82d79a8..c8b2364. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

Analyzer	Status	Summary	Link
JavaScript	✅ Success		View Check ↗

---

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

[codecov]

In general, the code changes made only involve an update to the version of the 'actions/checkout' GitHub Action used within various CI/CD workflow files. The commits referenced point to a newer version of the 'actions/checkout' action. Thus, it seems like a routine update for maintaining up-to-date dependencies. However, it is worth remembering that this specific change does not intrinsically enhance functionality in any way - it is more about keeping up to date with the latest version. That said, even though the changes seem trivial, each dependency should still be carefully evaluated for potential breaking changes.

[codecov]

The version of 'actions/checkout' has been updated here. It's important to ensure that 'actions/checkout' isn't introducing breaking changes with this new version, and that it's compatible with other existing actions in this workflow.

[codecov]

This line also sees an update of 'actions/checkout'. The same caution applies here as well, considering the compatibility and possible effects of this version update.

[codecov]

The updated version of 'actions/checkout' is used in this node-based workflow too. Ensure it functions as expected within this different context.

[codecov]

The version update of 'actions/checkout' also extends to the release workflow. Check the compatibility with the steps involving setup of Node.js and other actions.

[codecov]

The new version of 'actions/checkout' has also been reflected here in the semgrep workflow. Verify its integrity when integrated within this different workflow.

[codecov]

The code changes involve updating the version of the actions/checkout GitHub Action used in different workflows. The changes seems to be straightforward and there don't appear to be any significant quality concerns. However, there is a mismatch between the comment and the commit hash of the action being used. This can lead to confusion if someone was to look at the code in the future and wonders about this discrepancy.

[codecov]

While the checkout action has been updated to use a different commit hash, the comment next to it still refers to version 4. To avoid confusion, either clarify that this is an updated version of v4, specify the exact version, or remove the comment if it doesn't provide necessary context.

[codecov]

Exactly same as above, comment does not match commit hash. Please update for consistency and clarity.

[codecov]

The same discrepancy exists here as well. Please ensure that the comment matches the version specified by the commit hash for actions/checkout action.

[codecov]

The checkout action's comment does not match the used commit hash. The comment should be updated to provide an accurate indication of the version being used.

[codecov]

The employed commit hash does not match the comment. Please update it to maintain consistency and avoid confusion.

[codecov]

The changes made in the diff are setting the GitHub Actions Checkout action to specific commit, this will have the aim of ensuring consistency across all workflow files. This guarantees that all the workflows are using the same version of the actions/checkout - which from the comments appears to remain at version 4 - but the exact commit hash has changed.

[codecov]

It's good to pin actions to a specific commit for security and consistency purposes. However, it's generally a good idea to use tags for readability and ease of understanding if available. If the aim was to move to a different subversion of v4, this should be reflected in the comment.

[codecov]

The same comment applies here as for lines 10 and 23 with respect to making use of tags if available and updating the comment to reflect the specific subversion of v4 used.

[codecov]

The same comment applies here as for lines 10, 23 and 36. It's good to pin actions to a specific commit for security and consistency purposes. However, it's generally a good idea to use tags for readability and ease of understanding if available.

[codecov]

The same comment applies here as for lines 10, 23, 36 and 49. It's beneficial to ensure all workflows are using the same version of the actions/checkout. However, the use of tags if available and proper naming reflecting the exact version being used could make the code easier to maintain.

[codecov]

The code diff seems to be updating the version of the actions/checkout GitHub action used in various workflows. The changes seem consistent across workflows. However, the given SHA corresponds to an arbitrary commit which might not be an official release. Using an actual release (tagged version) would be more suitable and predictable. Also, it would be helpful to provide an explanation about why the version update is needed, ideally in comments in the YAML file to maintain clear documentation for team members.

[codecov]

The checkout action hash has been updated. Make sure to verify if this updated action version introduces any breaking changes.

[codecov]

The checkout action version has been changed. Please confirm if this new version is compatible with the existing workflows.

[codecov]

A new version of checkout action is used. Consider verifying whether this matrix configuration works as expected on the new version.

[codecov]

The version of the checkout action has been updated. Please ensure that the new version does not break any OAuth functionality.

[codecov]

The checkout action version change must be checked to ensure it doesn't affect the semgrep CI.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 9.74%. Comparing base (82d79a8) to head (c8b2364).

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main   #1954   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   9.74%   9.74%           
=====================================
  Files        133     133           
  Lines       9730    9730           
  Branches     161     161           
=====================================
  Hits         948     948           
  Misses      8782    8782           

Flag	Coverage Δ
cli	0.00% <ø> (ø)
connection	25.66% <ø> (ø)
database	9.70% <ø> (ø)
gateway	41.48% <ø> (ø)
mcots	0.00% <ø> (ø)
nps	0.00% <ø> (ø)
patch	86.08% <ø> (ø)
schema	0.00% <ø> (ø)
shard	41.47% <ø> (ø)
shared	13.44% <ø> (ø)
shared-packets	0.00% <ø> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud