ci: add slither job #431

scorpion9979 · 2023-04-11T13:05:40Z

Addresses #418.

ci: add more descriptive step names to slither job

ci: set slither target to "src" directory ci: set solidity version for slither compilation to 0.8.19

ci: ignore "solc-version" check from slither job

scorpion9979 · 2023-04-12T05:40:28Z

@PaulRBerg, I have added a Slither job to ci.yml with the following steps:

"Check out the repo": It checks out the repository, including submodules, using the "actions/checkout@v3" action.
"Run Slither analysis": This step uses the "crytic/slither-action@v0.3.0" action to run Slither on the Solidity source code in the "src/" directory. It configures Slither to ignore naming-convention and solc-version checks, and to use Solidity compiler version 0.8.19. The analysis results are saved in the SARIF (Static Analysis Results Interchange Format) file named "results.sarif". The step does not fail the job if Slither finds any issues.
Note: The target is set to "src/" instead of the default root directory of the project. Consequently, solc is used to compile the contracts instead of the default compilation framework for the root directory (i.e., Foundry).
"Upload SARIF file to GitHub code scanning": This step uploads the "results.sarif" file to GitHub code scanning using the "github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v2" action. This makes the analysis results available in the repository's "Security" tab and helps track potential vulnerabilities and code quality issues.
"Add summary": This step adds a summary of the Slither analysis results to the GitHub Actions step summary, indicating that the results have been uploaded to GitHub code scanning.

I opted to compile the files in the target directory using solc instead of the default Foundry compilation framework, as there appeared to be issues with the Foundry configuration that are causing the Slither action to fail with the error: slither: exited with status 255; aborting.

Currently the Slither job is still failing, but this is due to the repo being private and thus requiring Advanced Security to be enabled for the repo to use code scanning.

scorpion9979 · 2023-04-13T00:20:36Z

Update: I have updated the CI script to use the configuration in "slither.config.json" to run the Slither job.

scorpion9979 · 2023-04-13T04:30:44Z

Update: After further investigation, I believe I have pinpointed the issue preventing the use of the local Foundry compilation framework in the Slither job. It seems that the filter_paths field in the Slither configuration is not working as expected.
When running slither ./ --config-file slither.config.json locally, the process fails with the same AssertionError encountered in CI when running the Slither job in CI under the same conditions. However, when the test/ directory is removed before executing the same command, even though it's already filtered out by the filter_paths field, the process successfully completes and generates the Slither report.

PaulRBerg

Thanks, @scorpion9979. The PR itself looks great, but the fact that GitHub Code Scanning is available only the Advanced paid plans is a dealbreaker. We will have to wait until we open-source this repository before we merge this PR :(

I opted to compile the files in the target directory using solc instead of the default Foundry compilation framework, as there appeared to be issues with the Foundry configuration

That's strange; the Slither action works in PRBProxy without having to target src.

https://github.com/PaulRBerg/prb-proxy/blob/71d09da34f9c97d08b145825e0109c17a60c4f9a/.github/workflows/ci.yml#L122-L127

I have pinpointed the issue preventing the use of the local Foundry compilation framework in the Slither job; It seems that the filter_paths field in the Slither configuration is not working as expected

Should we notify the Slither maintainers about this issue?

UPDATE: as per my comment here, I now realize that I bumped into the same issue when I have first run Slither in this repo. The problem may be due to Sablier using modern Solidity features, e.g. user-defined value types.

.github/workflows/ci.yml

PaulRBerg · 2023-04-13T18:32:43Z

Ah, wait .. there's another reason why we have to postpone the merge of this PR. Slither does not yet support user-defined operators, but PRBMath V4 (implemented in #432) provides operators. I tried to run Slither locally but got this error:

KeyError: 'function'
ERROR:root:Error in src/SablierV2LockupLinear.sol
ERROR:root:Traceback (most recent call last):

See the full terminal output here:

https://app.warp.dev/block/nkfChxLnBlSQ2pFWZAT0fO

ci: fix double quotes in slither job ci: improve wording in slither summary step name

scorpion9979 · 2023-04-14T12:39:41Z

@PaulRBerg ,

Should we notify the Slither maintainers about this issue?

UPDATE: as per my comment #243 (comment), I now realize that I bumped into the same issue when I have first run Slither in this repo. The problem may be due to Sablier using modern Solidity features, e.g. user-defined value types.

After reading more about filter-paths in the Slither documentation, I started to think that its behavior might be in line with the maintainers' intentions, but easily misinterpreted by developers utilizing Slither. As per the Slither documentation:

--filter-paths path1 will exclude all the results that are only related to path1. The path specified can be a path directory or a filename.

This could suggest that the specified path will still be accessed by Slither, but any results from that path will be excluded from the final output. This explanation is in line with the behavior where the command slither . --filter-paths "test" fails, whereas the command slither . succeeds after removing the test/ directory. Maybe we we should notify the maintainers to clarify this in the documentation if this is indeed a case of miscommunication.

Ah, wait .. there's another reason why we have to postpone the merge of this PR. Slither does not yet support user-defined operators, but PRBMath V4 (implemented in #432) provides operators. I tried to run Slither locally but got this error:

KeyError: 'function'
ERROR:root:Error in src/SablierV2LockupLinear.sol
ERROR:root:Traceback (most recent call last):

See the full terminal output here:

https://app.warp.dev/block/nkfChxLnBlSQ2pFWZAT0fO

What version of Slither are you running? I tried running the same command locally and it worked fine.

Version:
Slither 0.9.3

Output:

$ slither src/SablierV2LockupLinear.sol

Compilation warnings/errors on src/SablierV2LockupLinear.sol:
Warning: Contract code size is 35175 bytes and exceeds 24576 bytes (a limit introduced in Spurious Dragon). This contract may not be deployable on Mainnet. Consider enabling the optimizer (with a low "runs" value!), turning off revert strings, or using libraries.
  --> src/SablierV2LockupLinear.sol:41:1:
   |
41 | contract SablierV2LockupLinear is
   | ^ (Relevant source part starts here and spans across multiple lines).


INFO:Detectors:
SablierV2FlashLoan.flashLoan(IERC3156FlashBorrower,address,uint256,bytes) (src/abstracts/SablierV2FlashLoan.sol#109-183) uses arbitrary from in transferFrom: IERC20(asset).safeTransferFrom(address(receiver),address(this),returnAmount) (src/abstracts/SablierV2FlashLoan.sol#169)
Reference: https://github.com/crytic/slither/wiki/Detector-Documentation#arbitrary-from-in-transferfrom
INFO:Detectors:
SablierV2LockupLinear._cancel(uint256) (src/SablierV2LockupLinear.sol#397-455) uses a dangerous strict equality:
        - senderAmount == 0 (src/SablierV2LockupLinear.sol#409)
SablierV2LockupLinear._cancel(uint256) (src/SablierV2LockupLinear.sol#397-455) uses a dangerous strict equality:
        - msg.sender == sender (src/SablierV2LockupLinear.sol#431)
SablierV2LockupLinear._isCallerStreamSender(uint256) (src/SablierV2LockupLinear.sol#309-311) uses a dangerous strict equality:
        - result = msg.sender == _streams[streamId].sender (src/SablierV2LockupLinear.sol#310)
SablierV2LockupLinear._streamedAmountOf(uint256) (src/SablierV2LockupLinear.sol#319-375) uses a dangerous strict equality:
        - status == Lockup.Status.DEPLETED (src/SablierV2LockupLinear.sol#324)
SablierV2LockupLinear._streamedAmountOf(uint256) (src/SablierV2LockupLinear.sol#319-375) uses a dangerous strict equality:
        - status == Lockup.Status.CANCELED (src/SablierV2LockupLinear.sol#328)
SablierV2LockupLinear.isSettled(uint256) (src/SablierV2LockupLinear.sol#195-201) uses a dangerous strict equality:
        - result = _streams[streamId].amounts.deposited == _streamedAmountOf(streamId) (src/SablierV2LockupLinear.sol#197)
Reference: https://github.com/crytic/slither/wiki/Detector-Documentation#dangerous-strict-equalities
INFO:Detectors:
SablierV2LockupLinear.createWithDurations(LockupLinear.CreateWithDurations).range (src/SablierV2LockupLinear.sol#260) is a local variable never initialized
Reference: https://github.com/crytic/slither/wiki/Detector-Documentation#uninitialized-local-variables
INFO:Detectors:
Adminable.transferAdmin(address).newAdmin (src/abstracts/Adminable.sol#34) lacks a zero-check on :
                - admin = newAdmin (src/abstracts/Adminable.sol#36)
Reference: https://github.com/crytic/slither/wiki/Detector-Documentation#missing-zero-address-validation
INFO:Detectors:
SablierV2LockupLinear._cancel(uint256) (src/SablierV2LockupLinear.sol#397-455) has external calls inside a loop: ISablierV2LockupRecipient(recipient).onStreamCanceled(streamId,senderAmount,recipientAmount) (src/SablierV2LockupLinear.sol#433-437)
SablierV2LockupLinear._cancel(uint256) (src/SablierV2LockupLinear.sol#397-455) has external calls inside a loop: ISablierV2LockupSender(sender).onStreamCanceled(streamId,senderAmount,recipientAmount) (src/SablierV2LockupLinear.sol#445-449)
SablierV2LockupLinear._withdraw(uint256,address,uint128) (src/SablierV2LockupLinear.sol#546-586) has external calls inside a loop: ISablierV2LockupRecipient(recipient).onStreamWithdrawn(streamId,msg.sender,to,amount) (src/SablierV2LockupLinear.sol#576-581)
Reference: https://github.com/crytic/slither/wiki/Detector-Documentation/#calls-inside-a-loop
INFO:Detectors:
Reentrancy in SablierV2FlashLoan.flashLoan(IERC3156FlashBorrower,address,uint256,bytes) (src/abstracts/SablierV2FlashLoan.sol#109-183):
        External calls:
        - IERC20(asset).safeTransfer(address(receiver),amount) (src/abstracts/SablierV2FlashLoan.sol#145)
        - response = receiver.onFlashLoan(msg.sender,asset,amount,fee,data) (src/abstracts/SablierV2FlashLoan.sol#148-149)
        State variables written after the call(s):
        - protocolRevenues[IERC20(asset)] += uint128(fee) (src/abstracts/SablierV2FlashLoan.sol#162)
Reference: https://github.com/crytic/slither/wiki/Detector-Documentation#reentrancy-vulnerabilities-2
INFO:Detectors:
SablierV2LockupLinear (src/SablierV2LockupLinear.sol#41-587) does not implement functions:
        - ISablierV2Base.protocolRevenues(IERC20) (src/interfaces/ISablierV2Base.sol#47)
Reference: https://github.com/crytic/slither/wiki/Detector-Documentation#unimplemented-functions
INFO:Slither:src/SablierV2LockupLinear.sol analyzed (34 contracts with 81 detectors), 14 result(s) found

PaulRBerg · 2023-06-30T15:27:18Z

FYI @scorpion9979, we've just made the repo public now - if you ever find a moment to rebase from main and re-configure Slither, we'd love to give this PR another shot!

However, it's worth noting that Slither still doesn't work with user-defined operators:

crytic/slither#1989

So I'm unsure if we can make Slither work with V2 Core, but it's worth trying!

scorpion9979 · 2023-06-30T15:52:52Z

Thanks, @PaulRBerg. I'll look into this and get back to you ASAP.

scorpion9979 · 2023-06-30T19:46:57Z

@PaulRBerg During my investigation of the problem, I was able to find a tiny bug in the Slither config that was causing the Slither CI job to fail at the solc remapping and compilation step. After addressing the bug, I was able to confirm that the job is now failing due to having no support for the user-defined operators used in prb-math.

Local Run

Command:

slither ./src --config-file slither.config.json

Version:

Slither 0.9.5

Output:

PaulRBerg · 2023-07-01T04:54:00Z

Thank you for your continued involvement in this PR, @scorpion9979! And sorry to hear that we can't merge this due to Slither not working with user-defined operators 😞

I will keep this PR open but I will mark it as backlog.

Local run
Output:

Thanks for sharing that.

Random pro tip: have you tried Warp? Their permalinks feature is pretty cool. The perfect solution for sharing terminal outputs as you did here.

scorpion9979 · 2023-07-01T05:14:31Z

Thanks, @PaulRBerg. Hopefully user-defined operators will be supported in time.

Re Warp: I've looked into using it, but unfortunately it's not available on Linux which is what I personally use.

scorpion9979 · 2023-10-20T01:07:19Z

@PaulRBerg Looks like Slither v0.10.0 fixes the crash on prb-math now, as mentioned in crytic/slither#1989 (comment). I've gone ahead and tested the repo locally with Slither v0.10.0 and I can confirm that it works as shown below. I've also gone ahead and merged the main branch into ci/slither in PR #713.

Local Run

Command:

slither ./src --config-file slither.config.json

Version:

Slither 0.10.0

Output:

PaulRBerg · 2023-10-20T09:17:52Z

Very cool, thanks for the update @scorpion9979. Could you please fix the git conflicts?

And @andreivladbrg, could you please assist Ahmed by reviewing this PR?

scorpion9979 · 2023-10-20T12:39:51Z

@andreivladbrg PR #713 fixes the merge conflicts.

* docs: delete wikis * test: polish precompiles tests build: add branch for solady in ".gitmodules" * docs: polish deployments section * docs: polish security program * docs: polish license section * chore: remove Codecov token * refactor: update gas snapshot * build: change version to 1.0.0-rc.0 chore: update "repository" in "package.json" * refactor: stringify create2 salts * refactor: rename deployer to broadcaster feat: use $ETH_FROM as broadcaster * chore: fix rpc url for gnosis chain * docs: refine license section * test: update createSelectFork * chore: use solhint-community build: add "solhint-community" node.js dep build: remove "solhint" node.js * build: bump solady * build: release v1.0.0 * test: remove duplicate bounds * docs: mention audits in the bug bounty * chore: say token streaming * test: rename "basic" to "concrete" * test: order imports correctly * perf: use vars.sablierAddress Closes #607 * perf: define "vars.asset" as "address" Closes #608 * fix: data URI scheme test: update hard-coded values test: use LibString to remove data URI prefix Closes #616 * test: update Precompiles bytecodes * docs: roll v1.0.1 docs: add CHANGELOG * docs: update recommended install branch * chore: add missing modifier in test_SetFlashFee test * Add Contribution info in README.md * test: convert 'flashFee' integration tests to unit tests * test: convert 'setFlashFee' integration tests to unit tests * test: add 'Comptroller' setup for concrete unit test * test: update 'flashFee' unit-test to inherit from Comptroller * test: update 'setFlashFee' unit-test to inherit from Comptroller * style: run prettier on README * test: deploy correctly precompiled comptroller * feat: deploy core 2 * test: change default profile value * Fix error when importing @prb/math packages when installed via npm (#648) * fix: address #646 * chore: update remapping in slither config --------- Co-authored-by: Paul Razvan Berg <paul.razvan.berg@gmail.com> * test: fix string parameter * docs: roll v1.0.2 * docs: update recommended remapping * docs: add "Architecture" in README closes #551 * perf: dry "isCold" and "isWarm" Closes #610 * docs: fix nitpicks Closes #611 * test: use "given" keyword in branching trees (#656) * refactor: using Given keyword in branching Trees (#641) * Using Given keyword on the branching trees (cherry picked from commit d365705) * test: use "it" for test nodes --------- Co-authored-by: Paul Razvan Berg <paul.razvan.berg@gmail.com> test: rename to "givenCallerAdmin" test: use given keyword in the integration branching trees test: use given keyword for modifiers for fuzz tests test: use given keyword in test contracts and brancing trees test: refactor test function names to use Given and When test: refactor test function names to use Given and When refactor: reverting in dev comments refactor: rename test function names to cleaner form test: polish branching trees test: improve "mapSymbol" tree test: improve "safeAssetDecimals" tree test: improve "safeAssetSymbol" tree * refactor: givenWithdrawableAmountNotZero modifier name * test: use "when" for time-related branches * test: address feedback in tree wording branch * test: polish branching trees * fix: remove duplicated branch in createWithMilestones.tree --------- Co-authored-by: Shub <shubhamy2015@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: andreivladbrg <andreivladbrg@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Alexander González <alexfertel97@gmail.com> * docs: mention audits * docs: add Discord badge * test: update comment * fix: fix incorrect spec in isStream.tree (#677) * test: use "given" instead of "when" (#678) * test: use "given" instead of "when" * test: correct "given" branches --------- Co-authored-by: andreivladbrg <andreivladbrg@gmail.com> * ci: cache testing contracts (#681) * Fix Github workflow build cache * ci: add "out" dir in github cache * Update .github/workflows/ci.yml * Update .github/workflows/ci.yml * Update .github/workflows/ci-deep.yml --------- Co-authored-by: Lumyo <lumyo@proton.me> Co-authored-by: Paul Razvan Berg <paul.razvan.berg@gmail.com> * feat: add transferrable bool field for stream NFT * feat: override _beforeTokenTransfer for Stream NFT and test cases * test: Add test for NFT transfer functionality * test: add more testing and resolve #669 * perf: dry "_beforeTokenTransfer" refactor: remove "canStreamTransfer" refactor: remove double "r" in "transferrable" refactor: simplify implementation test: allow non-transferable streams in invariant tests test: dry tests for "isTransferable" test: improve function and test names * test: add a new branch to burn.tree * test: polish burn tests * test: update precompiles * feat: implement _afterTokenTransfer to emit an event * test: expect MetadataUpdate event to be emitted * test: update Precompiles bytecode * test: transferFrom function * chore: add commented parameters in ERC721 hooks * docs: improve writing in NatSpec test: fix typos * build: upgrade solidity version to 0.8.21 (#688) * build: upgrade solidity version to 0.8.21 * build: bump the pragma back to >=0.8.19 * build: show unproved and unsupported SMTChecker * refactor: update gas snapshot --------- Co-authored-by: Paul Razvan Berg <paul.razvan.berg@gmail.com> * refactor: change the streamed amount to total amount in NFT SVG (#692) * refactor: change the streamed card from NFT SVG with total build: update shell scripts accordingly test: update tests accordingly * chore: say "total amount" in comments for total card * refactor: change the "Total" from NFT SVG with "Amount" build: update shell script accordingly test: update tests accordingly * chore: fix typo in shell script * refactor: dry-fy withdraw function refactor: dry-fy renounce function * build: remove OZ from peer dependencies * docs: roll 1.1.0 (#693) * docs: roll 1.1.0 * docs: update changelog --------- Co-authored-by: Paul Razvan Berg <paul.razvan.berg@gmail.com> * chore: fix typo in DataTypes * docs: correct github hyperlink docs: order change logs chronologically * docs: update changelog * build: switch to "solhint" chore: disable Solhint rules * refactor: capitalize immutable variables (#700) * refactor: capitalize immutable variables in NoDelegateCall build: remove "immutable-vars-naming" from solhint file * test: make asset and holder immutable in fork tests test: capitalize constans in fork tests * docs: polish background description * chore: remove "cbor_metadata" * perf: optimize withdraw function * Remove the ability to cancel for recipients (#710) * feat: remove ability to cancel for recipient feat: remove sender's hook test: update tests accordingly * feat: emit asset in cancel and withdraw events refactor: remove recipient from cancel event test: update tests accordingly test: update precompiles bytecode * chore: update gas snapshot * test: update Precompiles bytecode * docs: include recipient disable to cancel in changelog * refactor: add "recipient" in cancel event docs: refine explanatory comments refactor: reorder parameters in events * test: update Precompiles bytecode * chore: add explantory comment --------- Co-authored-by: Paul Razvan Berg <paul.razvan.berg@gmail.com> * test: add DeployOptimized utils contracts (#712) * test: add DeployOptimized utils contracts test: move and rename functions from Base_Test * docs: fix typo in comments * test: rename deploy optimized functions --------- Co-authored-by: Paul Razvan Berg <paul.razvan.berg@gmail.com> * style: fix Prettier formatting issue --------- Co-authored-by: Paul Razvan Berg <paul.razvan.berg@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: andreivladbrg <andreivladbrg@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Anton Cheng <antonassocareer@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Prince Allwin <127643894+worksofallwin@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: PraneshASP <praneshas2000@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Andrei Vlad Birgaoanu <99738872+andreivladbrg@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Shub <shubhamy2015@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Alexander González <alexfertel97@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Lumyo <lumyo@proton.me>

andreivladbrg · 2023-10-20T15:36:18Z

@andreivladbrg PR #713 fixes the merge conflicts.

it seems it doesn't, there have been too many commits since this PR was created.

I think it would be better to start a new PR starting from main, and include this change.

Can you work on this @scorpion9979 ?

scorpion9979 · 2023-10-20T16:14:59Z

@andreivladbrg Done here: #714

andreivladbrg · 2023-10-24T21:52:10Z

Closing in favor of #714

scorpion9979 added 2 commits April 10, 2023 17:50

ci: add slither job

3710f7a

ci: add a summary step to slither job

381875f

ci: add more descriptive step names to slither job

PaulRBerg added the testing label Apr 11, 2023

scorpion9979 added 3 commits April 11, 2023 18:33

ci: add missing permission to slither job

70b13e4

ci: do not use foundry as compilation framework for slither job

ed1d5ad

ci: set slither target to "src" directory ci: set solidity version for slither compilation to 0.8.19

ci: add missing permission to slither job

9591e62

ci: ignore "solc-version" check from slither job

ci: use config in slither.config.json for slither job

f5af9c8

PaulRBerg added the backlog label Apr 13, 2023

PaulRBerg requested changes Apr 13, 2023

View reviewed changes

PaulRBerg mentioned this pull request Apr 13, 2023

Integrate Slither for continuous static analysis #418

Closed

ci: remove redundant "--config-file" arg from slither job

224bc40

ci: fix double quotes in slither job ci: improve wording in slither summary step name

scorpion9979 force-pushed the ci/slither branch from 05089d9 to 224bc40 Compare April 13, 2023 23:53

PaulRBerg closed this May 18, 2023

PaulRBerg deleted the ci/slither branch May 18, 2023 11:11

PaulRBerg restored the ci/slither branch May 18, 2023 11:12

PaulRBerg reopened this May 18, 2023

PaulRBerg force-pushed the main branch 5 times, most recently from 32fed59 to 4aafb70 Compare May 28, 2023 18:40

PaulRBerg force-pushed the main branch from 1246016 to f495809 Compare June 29, 2023 18:49

Merge branch 'main' into ci/slither

96b1411

scorpion9979 force-pushed the ci/slither branch from 97c7bf9 to 2a2140a Compare June 30, 2023 20:49

chore: fix solc remap path in slither config

0d32137

scorpion9979 force-pushed the ci/slither branch from 2a2140a to 0d32137 Compare June 30, 2023 20:51

PaulRBerg force-pushed the main branch from 2a6682a to 68aa3a0 Compare July 9, 2023 14:53

PaulRBerg force-pushed the main branch from b669aaf to 443916c Compare August 14, 2023 15:43

PaulRBerg force-pushed the main branch from 9a7a0b9 to 6189bbc Compare October 14, 2023 12:58

scorpion9979 mentioned this pull request Oct 20, 2023

ci: add slither job #714

Merged

andreivladbrg closed this Oct 24, 2023

PaulRBerg deleted the ci/slither branch January 1, 2024 16:44

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

ci: add slither job #431

ci: add slither job #431

scorpion9979 commented Apr 11, 2023

scorpion9979 commented Apr 12, 2023

scorpion9979 commented Apr 13, 2023

scorpion9979 commented Apr 13, 2023 •

edited

Loading

PaulRBerg left a comment •

edited

Loading

PaulRBerg commented Apr 13, 2023

scorpion9979 commented Apr 14, 2023 •

edited

Loading

PaulRBerg commented Jun 30, 2023

scorpion9979 commented Jun 30, 2023

scorpion9979 commented Jun 30, 2023 •

edited

Loading

PaulRBerg commented Jul 1, 2023

scorpion9979 commented Jul 1, 2023

scorpion9979 commented Oct 20, 2023 •

edited

Loading

PaulRBerg commented Oct 20, 2023

scorpion9979 commented Oct 20, 2023

andreivladbrg commented Oct 20, 2023

scorpion9979 commented Oct 20, 2023

andreivladbrg commented Oct 24, 2023

ci: add slither job #431

ci: add slither job #431

Conversation

scorpion9979 commented Apr 11, 2023

scorpion9979 commented Apr 12, 2023

scorpion9979 commented Apr 13, 2023

scorpion9979 commented Apr 13, 2023 • edited Loading

PaulRBerg left a comment • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

PaulRBerg commented Apr 13, 2023

scorpion9979 commented Apr 14, 2023 • edited Loading

PaulRBerg commented Jun 30, 2023

scorpion9979 commented Jun 30, 2023

scorpion9979 commented Jun 30, 2023 • edited Loading

Local Run

Command:

Version:

Output:

PaulRBerg commented Jul 1, 2023

scorpion9979 commented Jul 1, 2023

scorpion9979 commented Oct 20, 2023 • edited Loading

Local Run

Command:

Version:

Output:

PaulRBerg commented Oct 20, 2023

scorpion9979 commented Oct 20, 2023

andreivladbrg commented Oct 20, 2023

scorpion9979 commented Oct 20, 2023

andreivladbrg commented Oct 24, 2023

scorpion9979 commented Apr 13, 2023 •

edited

Loading

PaulRBerg left a comment •

edited

Loading

scorpion9979 commented Apr 14, 2023 •

edited

Loading

scorpion9979 commented Jun 30, 2023 •

edited

Loading

scorpion9979 commented Oct 20, 2023 •

edited

Loading