Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Intersection for more than two ideals #11879

Closed
sagetrac-ranosch mannequin opened this issue Sep 30, 2011 · 10 comments
Closed

Intersection for more than two ideals #11879

sagetrac-ranosch mannequin opened this issue Sep 30, 2011 · 10 comments

Comments

@sagetrac-ranosch
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-ranosch mannequin commented Sep 30, 2011

Currently, sage.rings.polynomial.multi_polynomial_ideal.MPolynomialIdeal_singular_repr.intersection() only takes one argument, while the singular interpreter accepts more.

Depends on #9138
Depends on #11900
Depends on #11115
Depends on #11068
Depends on #11761
Depends on #4539

CC: @sagetrac-PolyBoRi @burcin

Component: commutative algebra

Keywords: singular intersection sd34 sd35

Author: Niels Ranosch

Reviewer: Julian Rueth

Merged: sage-5.0.beta1

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/11879

@sagetrac-ranosch sagetrac-ranosch mannequin added this to the sage-4.8 milestone Sep 30, 2011
@sagetrac-ranosch sagetrac-ranosch mannequin assigned malb Sep 30, 2011
@saraedum
Copy link
Member

comment:2

applies to sage-4.8.alpha3 and all doctests pass.

@saraedum
Copy link
Member

Changed keywords from singular intersection sd34 to singular intersection sd34 sd35

@jdemeyer jdemeyer modified the milestones: sage-4.8, sage-5.0 Dec 23, 2011
@jdemeyer
Copy link

comment:5

This patch conflicts with #4539 and should be rebased.

@jdemeyer
Copy link

Dependencies: #9138, #11900, #11115, #11068, #11761, #4539

@jdemeyer
Copy link

Work Issues: rebase

@sagetrac-ranosch
Copy link
Mannequin Author

sagetrac-ranosch mannequin commented Jan 17, 2012

comment:6

Attachment: trac-11879_intersection-several-ideals.patch.gz

Rebased on 4.7.2 with these patches applied:

trac4539_libplural_rel11761.patch
trac4539_pickling_rel10903.patch
trac4539_normal_forms_rel10903.patch
trac4539_fix_docs_rel10903.patch

The "conflict" was a blank line.

@jdemeyer
Copy link

comment:7

If you just did a simple rebase, there is no need to re-review it. You can set back positive review yourself.

@jdemeyer
Copy link

Changed work issues from rebase to none

@jdemeyer
Copy link

Reviewer: Julian Rueth

@jdemeyer
Copy link

Merged: sage-5.0.beta1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants