Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

performance of dimension of cusp forms for Gamma(N) is insanely slow #12001

Closed
williamstein opened this issue Nov 7, 2011 · 5 comments
Closed

Comments

@williamstein
Copy link
Contributor

One of the easiest dimension formulas is for the dimension of S_2(Gamma(p)). However, in Sage, computing this dimension is shockingly slow. For example,

sage: time Gamma(7).dimension_cusp_forms()
3
Time: CPU 17.27 s, Wall: 17.30 s
sage: time dimension_cusp_forms(Gamma(7),2)
3
Time: CPU 17.22 s, Wall: 17.25 s

Fix this.

Component: modular forms

Reviewer: David Loeffler

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12001

@loefflerd
Copy link
Mannequin

loefflerd mannequin commented Dec 26, 2011

comment:1

This is fixed by #10546. With #10546 installed,

sage: time Gamma(17777).dimension_cusp_forms()
233722059481
Time: CPU 0.00 s, Wall: 0.00 s

So I propose we close this ticket.

@loefflerd loefflerd mannequin added the s: needs review label Dec 26, 2011
@loefflerd
Copy link
Mannequin

loefflerd mannequin commented Dec 26, 2011

comment:2

Correction: It is #11601, not #10546, that fixes this, by implementing "nu3". Anyway, the point is that it's fixed.

@williamstein
Copy link
Contributor Author

comment:3

Fantastic!

@loefflerd
Copy link
Mannequin

loefflerd mannequin commented Dec 27, 2011

comment:4

I'm setting this to "positive review" to bring it to the attention of the release manager. Release manager: please close as fixed once #11601 is merged.

@jdemeyer jdemeyer removed this from the sage-4.8 milestone Dec 28, 2011
@jdemeyer
Copy link

Reviewer: David Loeffler

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants