New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug in Sage's monodromy pairing on elements of Brandt modules #12866
Comments
Branch: u/aly.deines/ticket/12866 |
Changed branch from u/aly.deines/ticket/12866 to u/tornaria/ticket/12866 |
Commit: |
comment:6
I rebased Aly's patch to sage-6.4.beta1. I added a series of commits to fix a typo in her patch, add some explanation of the computation that is being done, and then an asymptotic improvement so that the monodromy pairing can be computed in O(n) rather than O(n2) ideal computations. New commits:
|
Author: aly.deines, tornaria |
Stopgaps: todo |
Changed branch from u/tornaria/ticket/12866 to public/12866 |
comment:9
I have made a branch with other changes to the file:
New commits:
|
Changed author from aly.deines, tornaria to Aly Deines, Gonzalo Tornaria |
Changed stopgaps from todo to none |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Reviewer: Frédéric Chapoton |
comment:15
I have checked the code of the authors. Therefore I am going to set this to positive review. |
Changed branch from public/12866 to |
Changed author from Aly Deines, Gonzalo Tornaria to Aly Deines, Gonzalo Tornaría |
Changed commit from |
In Magma:
In Sage:
Component: modular forms
Keywords: Brandt module, monodromy pairing
Author: Aly Deines, Gonzalo Tornaría
Branch:
448cd9d
Reviewer: Frédéric Chapoton
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12866
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: