Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade eclib #13021

Closed
SnarkBoojum mannequin opened this issue May 26, 2012 · 13 comments
Closed

Upgrade eclib #13021

SnarkBoojum mannequin opened this issue May 26, 2012 · 13 comments

Comments

@SnarkBoojum
Copy link
Mannequin

SnarkBoojum mannequin commented May 26, 2012

There are now several more recent upstream tarballs available here http://code.google.com/p/eclib/downloads/list.

CC: @JohnCremona

Component: packages: standard

Reviewer: Julien Puydt, Jeroen Demeyer

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/13021

@SnarkBoojum SnarkBoojum mannequin added this to the sage-5.11 milestone May 26, 2012
@SnarkBoojum
Copy link
Mannequin Author

SnarkBoojum mannequin commented Jul 6, 2012

spkg for eclib version 2012-07-03

@SnarkBoojum
Copy link
Mannequin Author

SnarkBoojum mannequin commented Jul 6, 2012

Attachment: eclib-20120703.spkg.gz

Patch to make sage compile (and doctests run) with the spkg of eclib version 2012-07-03

@SnarkBoojum
Copy link
Mannequin Author

SnarkBoojum mannequin commented Jul 6, 2012

comment:1

Attachment: trac_13021.patch.gz

@SnarkBoojum SnarkBoojum mannequin added the s: needs review label Jul 6, 2012
@jdemeyer
Copy link

comment:2

Please fill in your real name as Author.

@SnarkBoojum
Copy link
Mannequin Author

SnarkBoojum mannequin commented Aug 6, 2012

Author: Julien Puydt

@kcrisman
Copy link
Member

comment:4
gc04855:sage-5.9.rc0 $ ./sage -i
Currently installed packages:
atlas-3.8.4.p1
<snip>
ecl-12.12.1.p2
eclib-20120830
ecm-6.3.p8
elliptic_curves-0.7
<snip>
gc04855:sage-5.9.rc0 $ 

So... is this ticket obsolete? Or should we now upgrade to the 2013 (or beyond) version here?

Also, the site is now on github.

@JohnCremona
Copy link
Member

comment:5

I think this ticket is now obsolete having been leapfrogged by whichever one introduced eclib-20120830.

I had been planning to make a new eclib spkg after flint-2.3 was in Sage, though the current build system (as at github now (April 2013)) works with or without it, the part of the code which provides Sage's CremonaModularSymbols() is rather faster with Flint.

@kcrisman
Copy link
Member

comment:6

So could this ticket be repurposed for that?

@JohnCremona
Copy link
Member

comment:7

Replying to @kcrisman:

So could this ticket be repurposed for that?

Unless you are afraid that we will run out of ticket numbers, I don't think tha would save a lot -- the attachments here need changing as well as the description. A new ticket with a forward reference here seems simpler to me.

@kcrisman
Copy link
Member

comment:8

So could this ticket be repurposed for that?

Unless you are afraid that we will run out of ticket numbers, I don't think tha would save a lot -- the attachments here need changing as well as the description. A new ticket with a forward reference here seems simpler to me.

Feel free to provide that, then; otherwise we can just close this.

@jdemeyer jdemeyer modified the milestones: sage-5.11, sage-5.12 Aug 13, 2013
@sagetrac-vbraun-spam sagetrac-vbraun-spam mannequin modified the milestones: sage-6.1, sage-6.2 Jan 30, 2014
@sagetrac-vbraun-spam sagetrac-vbraun-spam mannequin modified the milestones: sage-6.2, sage-6.3 May 6, 2014
@sagetrac-vbraun-spam sagetrac-vbraun-spam mannequin modified the milestones: sage-6.3, sage-6.4 Aug 10, 2014
@jdemeyer
Copy link

Reviewer: Julien Puydt, Jeroen Demeyer

@jdemeyer
Copy link

Changed author from Julien Puydt to none

@jdemeyer
Copy link

comment:13

Duplicate of various other eclib upgrade tickets...

@jdemeyer jdemeyer removed this from the sage-6.4 milestone Oct 12, 2014
@vbraun vbraun closed this as completed Oct 13, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants