Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Please consider updating to gfan 0.5 #13207

Closed
pcpa mannequin opened this issue Jul 5, 2012 · 4 comments
Closed

Please consider updating to gfan 0.5 #13207

pcpa mannequin opened this issue Jul 5, 2012 · 4 comments

Comments

@pcpa
Copy link
Mannequin

pcpa mannequin commented Jul 5, 2012

As far as I checked, the sagemath gfan spkg patches are already applied to gfan 0.5.

I made a few changes to the package in a RFE (request for enhancement) to the gfan 0.5 fedora package at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837857. Most noticeable one should be that I added a gfan-permissive.patch to make it work if called as gfan instead of erroring out and telling to call it gfan_bases. But it could be changed to be called as 'gfan_bases' in sage/interfaces/gfan.py.

See #11395 instead.

Component: interfaces

Reviewer: Marshall Hampton

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/13207

@pcpa pcpa mannequin added this to the sage-5.2 milestone Jul 5, 2012
@pcpa pcpa mannequin added p: minor / 4 labels Jul 5, 2012
@pcpa pcpa mannequin assigned williamstein Jul 5, 2012
@pcpa pcpa mannequin added the c: interfaces label Jul 5, 2012
@sagetrac-mhampton
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-mhampton mannequin commented Jul 7, 2012

comment:2

This is a duplicate of #11395. I hope to work on this next week at Sage-Combinat Days 40.

@kcrisman
Copy link
Member

Reviewer: Marshall Hampton

@kcrisman kcrisman removed this from the sage-5.2 milestone Jul 12, 2012
@kcrisman
Copy link
Member

comment:4

Yup.

@jdemeyer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants