More doctests for sage.rings

[tscrim]

More doctests for the rest of sage.rings as a followup to #13618. This adds documentation for minor functions in the following files:

• sage/rings/commutative_algebra.py
• sage/rings/commutative_ring.py
• sage/rings/commutative_ring_element.py
• sage/rings/dedekind_domain.py
• sage/rings/dedekind_domain_element.py
• sage/rings/euclidean_domain.py
• sage/rings/euclidean_domain_element.py
• sage/rings/field.py
• sage/rings/field_element.py
• sage/rings/fraction_field.py
• sage/rings/fraction_field_element.pyx
• sage/rings/function_field/constructor.py
• sage/rings/ideal_monoid.py
• sage/rings/infinity.py
• sage/rings/integer_ring.pyx
• sage/rings/integer_ring_python.py
• sage/rings/integral_domain.py
• sage/rings/integral_domain_element.py
• sage/rings/monomials.py
• sage/rings/morphism.pyx
• sage/rings/multi_power_series_ring_element.py
• sage/rings/noncommutative_ideals.pyx
• sage/rings/principal_ideal_domain.py
• sage/rings/principal_ideal_domain_element.py
• sage/rings/quotient_ring.py
• sage/rings/residue_field.pyx
• sage/rings/ring.pyx

Most of these files were a few functions short of 100% doctest coverage. This patch also goes through and cleans up some of the documentation in these files as well.

Depends on #13618
Depends on #14040

Component: doctest coverage

Author: Travis Scrimshaw

Reviewer: Volker Braun

Merged: sage-5.9.beta2

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/13685

[tscrim]

Changed dependencies from #12496 to none

[tscrim]

comment:2

Rebased to 5.5.rc0

[vbraun]

Dependencies: #13618

[vbraun]

Reviewer: Volker Braun

[vbraun]

comment:4

Looks good to me.

[tscrim]

comment:6

Thank you for reviewing this,

Travis

[vbraun]

comment:7

Needs to be rebased for sage-5.8.beta1, I get

Hunk #77 succeeded at 2051 with fuzz 2 (offset -1 lines).

(we don't like fuzz > 1)

[tscrim]

comment:8

I'll build 5.8.beta1 over tonight and post the updated patch tomorrow.

[tscrim]

Changed dependencies from #13618 to #13618 #14040

[tscrim]

comment:9

And I'll also rebase over #14040.

[jdemeyer]

comment:10

In fact, better to wait for sage-5.8.beta2 as there are more patches to rings with positive review.

[tscrim]

comment:11

Replying to @jdemeyer:

In fact, better to wait for sage-5.8.beta2 as there are more patches to rings with positive review.

Will do.

[tscrim]

Rebased to 5.9.beta1

[tscrim]

comment:12

Attachment: trac_13685-misc_rings_doc-ts.patch.gz

Rebased to 5.9.beta1.

[jdemeyer]

Merged: sage-5.9.beta2