We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
This patch fixes a bug in the cyclic sieving phenomenon.
Without the patch applied, we have
sage: from sage.combinat.cyclic_sieving_phenomenon import CyclicSievingPolynomial sage: S42 = [ Set(S) for S in subsets([1,2,3,4]) if len(S) == 2 ]; S42 sage: cyc_act = lambda S: Set( i.mod(4)+1 for i in S) sage: CyclicSievingPolynomial( S42, cyc_act, order=8, get_order=True ) [q^6 + 2*q^4 + q^2 + 2, 4]
while with the patch applied, you get
sage: CyclicSievingPolynomial( S42, cyc_act, order=8, get_order=True ) [q^6 + 2*q^4 + q^2 + 2, 8]
CC: @fchapoton
Component: combinatorics
Keywords: cyclic sieving phenomenon
Author: Christian Stump
Reviewer: Frédéric Chapoton
Merged: sage-5.7.beta1
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/13997
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Attachment: trac_13997-v2.patch.gz
Sorry, something went wrong.
ok for me. Positive review
sagetrac-sage-combinat
No branches or pull requests
This patch fixes a bug in the cyclic sieving phenomenon.
Without the patch applied, we have
while with the patch applied, you get
CC: @fchapoton
Component: combinatorics
Keywords: cyclic sieving phenomenon
Author: Christian Stump
Reviewer: Frédéric Chapoton
Merged: sage-5.7.beta1
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/13997
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: