New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clean SAGE_ROOT from module_list.py (again) #14393
Comments
comment:1
It has been bothering me for a while that a few people have been using naked SAGE_ROOT in there. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
comment:2
Could you have a look at this Christopher? I was hoping Andrew would be interested but he must be busy elsewhere. I'd very much want to see this in 5.9. |
comment:3
Looks good to me. Do you want me to test it as well? I could do this at the weekend. |
comment:4
It should be done properly, so yes testing. Testing is the only way to see if I missed something, which I don't think I did. |
comment:5
OK, I will test it this weekend. |
comment:6
I checked with beta2; patch applies cleanly and the build is fine. |
Reviewer: Christopher Schwan |
comment:7
OK I put it in positive review then. |
Author: Francois Bissey |
Attachment: trac14393-cleanup.patch.gz clean up module_list.py |
Changed author from Francois Bissey to François Bissey |
Merged: sage-5.9.beta5 |
A few tickets have been using SAGE_ROOT directly or not used SAGE_INC since my last clean up. After cleaning direct calls to SAGE_ROOT in the rest of sage we need to spend some time here.
The use of SAGE_INC has also been normalized everywhere so it is not necessary to add a final "/". The use of predefined depend variables has been enforced as much as I could see it.
Apply to the sage library:
CC: @ohanar @cschwan
Component: build
Author: François Bissey
Reviewer: Christopher Schwan
Merged: sage-5.9.beta5
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14393
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: