New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Mistake in the doc of Steiner Quadruple Systems #14696
Comments
comment:2
More work for you: the file is littered with stuff written like |
comment:3
I've seen that with round brackets, usually the mod is spelled out as |
comment:4
Patch updated ! I went into Florent's office and asked him if he had ever used this bracket notation, and he told me that he rarely if ever used it. That he mostly saw And I am almost sure that I never wrote "mod" of my whole life, and always used these brackets.. In lectures, in exams, everywhere Soooooooooooooo maybe I'm mad, but I still updated the patch. I also renamed an "height" into a "eight", because I am an idiot. Turns out that this review was more complicated than expected Nathann |
comment:5
One typo: the first mod should be
Yes, that's the problem with the old code in sage. If you touch at one place, you have to touch it at many places. ;) |
comment:6
Donnnnneeeeeeee !! Nathann |
Reviewer: Punarbasu Purkayastha |
comment:7
Attachment: trac_14696.patch.gz Great! Looks good to me. Thanks :) |
comment:8
Thanks for the review ! And I owe you one Nathann |
Merged: sage-5.11.rc0 |
Gloops.... The mistake is just in the doc, not in the code ! The function
designs.steiner_quadruple_system
checks that the system exist for all integers n equal to 2 or 4 mod 6^^;
Nathann
CC: @vbraun
Component: documentation
Author: Nathann Cohen
Reviewer: Punarbasu Purkayastha
Merged: sage-5.11.rc0
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14696
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: