Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LaTeX typeseting of SR.wild should prefix $ with \ #15047

Closed
sagetrac-aginiewicz mannequin opened this issue Aug 15, 2013 · 18 comments
Closed

LaTeX typeseting of SR.wild should prefix $ with \ #15047

sagetrac-aginiewicz mannequin opened this issue Aug 15, 2013 · 18 comments

Comments

@sagetrac-aginiewicz
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-aginiewicz mannequin commented Aug 15, 2013

Currently calling

latex(SR.wild(0))

results in '$0'. When using this with SageTeX, it causes issues due to special meaning of $ in TeX. I believe this call should return '$0' instead. For now when using SageTeX I have to use something like

LatexExpr(latex(SR.wild(0)).replace(r'$',r'\$'))

Depends on #18237

Upstream: Fixed upstream, in a later stable release.

Component: symbolics

Keywords: pynac wildcard latex

Author: Ralf Stephan

Branch/Commit: ef13c36

Reviewer: Jan Keitel

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15047

@sagetrac-aginiewicz sagetrac-aginiewicz mannequin added this to the sage-6.1 milestone Aug 15, 2013
@sagetrac-aginiewicz
Copy link
Mannequin Author

sagetrac-aginiewicz mannequin commented Aug 15, 2013

comment:1

I will provide patch for it later this month when I have time, unless someone does it earlier, as this should be trivial to fix (like single keystroke).

@sagetrac-aginiewicz
Copy link
Mannequin Author

sagetrac-aginiewicz mannequin commented Aug 18, 2013

Changed keywords from wildcard latex to pynac wildcard latex

@sagetrac-aginiewicz
Copy link
Mannequin Author

sagetrac-aginiewicz mannequin commented Aug 18, 2013

comment:4

Right now I'm not sure if I will provide patch this month, because I wasn't aware it comes from pynac - I've never looked into pynac... yet.

@sagetrac-vbraun-spam sagetrac-vbraun-spam mannequin modified the milestones: sage-6.1, sage-6.2 Jan 30, 2014
@sagetrac-vbraun-spam sagetrac-vbraun-spam mannequin modified the milestones: sage-6.2, sage-6.3 May 6, 2014
@sagetrac-vbraun-spam sagetrac-vbraun-spam mannequin modified the milestones: sage-6.3, sage-6.4 Aug 10, 2014
@rwst
Copy link

rwst commented Apr 10, 2015

Upstream: Fixed upstream, in a later stable release.

@rwst
Copy link

rwst commented Apr 10, 2015

Dependencies: #18155

@rwst
Copy link

rwst commented Apr 10, 2015

comment:8

Fixed in pynac/pynac#17

@rwst rwst modified the milestones: sage-6.4, sage-6.6 Apr 10, 2015
@rwst
Copy link

rwst commented Apr 11, 2015

@rwst
Copy link

rwst commented Apr 11, 2015

Commit: 0307040

@rwst
Copy link

rwst commented Apr 11, 2015

New commits:

030704015047: doctest; fixed in pynac-0.3.3

@rwst
Copy link

rwst commented Apr 11, 2015

Author: Ralf Stephan

@behackl
Copy link
Member

behackl commented Apr 17, 2015

Changed dependencies from #18155 to #18237

@sagetrac-jkeitel
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-jkeitel mannequin commented Apr 17, 2015

comment:12

I'd be happy to give this a positive review, but I think you made a typo - this ticket number is 15047, not 15048. ;-)

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented Apr 17, 2015

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:

ef13c3615047: typo

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented Apr 17, 2015

Changed commit from 0307040 to ef13c36

@sagetrac-jkeitel
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-jkeitel mannequin commented Apr 17, 2015

comment:14

Checked with new pynac version and LGTM

@sagetrac-jkeitel
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-jkeitel mannequin commented Apr 17, 2015

Reviewer: Jan Keitel

@rwst
Copy link

rwst commented Apr 18, 2015

comment:15

Thanks.

@rwst rwst modified the milestones: sage-6.6, sage-6.7 Apr 18, 2015
@vbraun
Copy link
Member

vbraun commented Apr 19, 2015

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants