New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Put ATLAS archdef tarballs into patches/ARCHS and resync ATLAS-lib dir #15615
Comments
comment:1
Ive take the opportunity to add an ARM archdef tarball as provided at http://math-atlas.sourceforge.net/errata.html#armhardfp New commits:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Commit: |
Branch: u/jpflori/ticket/15615 |
Author: Jean-Pierre Flori |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Changed keywords from atlas spkg archdef to atlas spkg archdef cygwin |
comment:2
The ATLAS-lib issue is surely my bad as it is already wrong in the sage 5.13 tarball... |
comment:3
Since we have to make our own ATLAS tarball anyways to embed lapack, I would be in favor of putting the archdef tarballs in there as well. Even though they are small, they are still binary stuff that we should keep out of the repo if possible. |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:5
Replying to @vbraun:
Yes, we also have to generate the autotools project an d put it in. |
comment:6
Putting them into our git repo doesn't make it easier to obtain the archdefs either, it jut puts binary crap into our repo. If anything, it makes it worse for non-Sage users to get the archdefs. |
comment:7
Ok, so let's just put them somewhere on sagemath... |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits: |
comment:9
Ok, now the archef tarballs are within the "upstream" tarball. |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:11
I've put the current archdefs at http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jpflori/archdefs/ |
comment:12
This fails to build on Cygwin64 when SAGE_FAT_BINARY is set, and is easy to fix: just don't force isa extensions as the win64 abi is not the same as the amd64 one and asm code cannot be assembled... |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:14
Changing the tarball without the version (excluding the patchlevel) is not supported ATM, I think. We cache files in the upstream/ dir as Either combine with an upstream version bump or wait until the build system can handle this case. Apart from that, positive review ;-) |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Reviewer: Volker Braun |
Not sure why but it seems the tarballs we shipped did not make the git transition.
The ATLAS-lib dir is also outdated.
Please use the tarball at:
CC: @vbraun @dimpase
Component: packages: standard
Keywords: atlas spkg archdef cygwin
Author: Jean-Pierre Flori
Branch/Commit: u/jpflori/ticket/15615 @
d8da989
Reviewer: Volker Braun
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15615
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: