Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Invalid?] RealDoubleField documentation missing #1565

Closed
sagetrac-phatsphere mannequin opened this issue Dec 19, 2007 · 6 comments
Closed

[Invalid?] RealDoubleField documentation missing #1565

sagetrac-phatsphere mannequin opened this issue Dec 19, 2007 · 6 comments

Comments

@sagetrac-phatsphere
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-phatsphere mannequin commented Dec 19, 2007

Somewhere I read that missing documentation should be considered as a bug:
sage version 2.9

RealDoubleField?
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
  File "/home/server4/sage_notebook/worksheets/phatsphere/0/code/11.py", line 4, in <module>
    print _support_.docstring("RealDoubleField", globals())
  File "/usr/local/sage-2.6/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/sage/server/support.py", line 142, in docstring
    s += 'Definition:  %s\n'%sageinspect.sage_getdef(obj, obj_name)
  File "/usr/local/sage-2.6/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/sage/misc/sageinspect.py", line 276, in sage_getdef
    spec = sage_getargspec(obj)
  File "/usr/local/sage-2.6/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/sage/misc/sageinspect.py", line 249, in sage_getargspec
    return _sage_getargspec_cython(source)
  File "/usr/local/sage-2.6/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/sage/misc/sageinspect.py", line 201, in _sage_getargspec_cython
    raise ValueError, "Could not parse cython argspec"
ValueError: Could not parse cython argspec

Component: documentation

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/1565

@sagetrac-mabshoff
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-mabshoff mannequin commented Dec 19, 2007

comment:1

I cannot reproduce this with either Sage 2.9.1.alpha1 compiled from source as well as 2.9 on sage.math:

mabshoff@sage:/tmp/Work-mabshoff/sage-2.9.1.alpha1$ ./sage
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| SAGE Version 2.9.1.alpha1, Release Date: 2007-12-18                |
| Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.        |
----------------------------------------------------------------------

sage: RealDoubleField?
Type:           builtin_function_or_method
Base Class:     <type 'builtin_function_or_method'>
String Form:    <built-in function RealDoubleField>
Namespace:      Interactive

sage: RealDoubleField??
Type:           builtin_function_or_method
Base Class:     <type 'builtin_function_or_method'>
String Form:    <built-in function RealDoubleField>
Namespace:      Interactive
Source:
def RealDoubleField():
    global _RDF
    return _RDF
sage:
Exiting SAGE (CPU time 0m0.02s, Wall time 0m38.13s).
mabshoff@sage:/tmp/Work-mabshoff/sage-2.9.1.alpha1$ sage
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| SAGE Version 2.9, Release Date: 2007-12-16                         |
| Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.        |
----------------------------------------------------------------------

sage: RealDoubleField?
Type:           builtin_function_or_method
Base Class:     <type 'builtin_function_or_method'>
String Form:    <built-in function RealDoubleField>
Namespace:      Interactive

sage: RealDoubleField??
Type:           builtin_function_or_method
Base Class:     <type 'builtin_function_or_method'>
String Form:    <built-in function RealDoubleField>
Namespace:      Interactive
Source:
def RealDoubleField():
    global _RDF
    return _RDF
sage:

Cheers,

Michael

@sagetrac-mabshoff sagetrac-mabshoff mannequin added this to the sage-2.9.1 milestone Dec 19, 2007
@sagetrac-mabshoff sagetrac-mabshoff mannequin changed the title RealDoubleField documentation missing [is invalid?] RealDoubleField documentation missing Dec 19, 2007
@malb
Copy link
Member

malb commented Dec 19, 2007

comment:2

Replying to @sagetrac-mabshoff:

I cannot reproduce this with either Sage 2.9.1.alpha1 compiled from source as well as 2.9 on sage.math:

sage: RealDoubleField?
Type:           builtin_function_or_method
Base Class:     <type 'builtin_function_or_method'>
String Form:    <built-in function RealDoubleField>
Namespace:      Interactive

Actually, you just reproduced it: There is no documentation.

@malb malb changed the title [is invalid?] RealDoubleField documentation missing RealDoubleField documentation missing Dec 19, 2007
@sagetrac-mabshoff
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-mabshoff mannequin commented Dec 22, 2007

comment:3

The patch for #1459 might also fix this issue.

Cheers,

Michael

@sagetrac-mabshoff sagetrac-mabshoff mannequin changed the title RealDoubleField documentation missing [fixed in 2.9.1?] RealDoubleField documentation missing Dec 24, 2007
@sagetrac-mabshoff
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-mabshoff mannequin commented Dec 26, 2007

comment:5

This wasn't fixed in 2.9.1.

Cheers,

Michael

@sagetrac-mabshoff sagetrac-mabshoff mannequin changed the title [fixed in 2.9.1?] RealDoubleField documentation missing RealDoubleField documentation missing Dec 26, 2007
@garyfurnish
Copy link
Mannequin

garyfurnish mannequin commented Jun 15, 2008

comment:6

This is fixed as of 3.0.3.alpha2. Please close

@garyfurnish garyfurnish mannequin changed the title RealDoubleField documentation missing [Invalid?] RealDoubleField documentation missing Jun 15, 2008
@sagetrac-mabshoff
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-mabshoff mannequin commented Jun 16, 2008

comment:7

Closed since it is fixed :)

Cheers,

Michael

@sagetrac-mabshoff sagetrac-mabshoff mannequin closed this as completed Jun 16, 2008
@sagetrac-mabshoff sagetrac-mabshoff mannequin modified the milestones: sage-3.0.4, sage-3.0.3 Jun 16, 2008
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant