New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[very positive review] implicit multiplication -- sage needs to have *some* way to do this (even if not by default) #1576
Comments
comment:2
I've implemented implicit_mul, the output for the above expressions are:
There is an optional flag, level, which at the highest value produces:
Which could be bad, for example At all but this highest level, I believe it never mangles valid Python. Just to test, I pre-parsed the entire SAGE library through this function and there were no changes. Some more examples:
This is not yet on by default. |
Attachment: 1576-implicit_mul.diff.gz |
comment:4
This is frickin awesome! I think we should just enable this by default via the preparser. WOW! This is very nice to work with. |
comment:5
|
comment:6
Merged in 2.9.2.rc1. |
Here are some examples that should probably work (from somebody named amscopub-travel)
As per an irc conversation last week, here is a list of math
expressions using implicit multiplication. Sorry for the delay:
A first version of this could simply be a function
that takes a string as input, and outputs
Component: calculus
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/1576
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: