New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
provide missing function expansions of power series #16197
Comments
comment:1
Similarly to my other comment on this, I don't know if we want Also, the regular
so I'm not sure why you referenced it, though I agree that the error you get for power series rings is not ideal. Is there a way to either use SR for this (perhaps not "correct" for power series rings though?) or to get Pari to return a symbolic constant term?
What if the coefficients weren't rationals? Or integers? Note that in your example there is a 16/3 coefficient, which presumably isn't in the power series ring over integers. These may be dumb questions, but I'm just trying to explore what is really the desired behavior - certainly wrapping more Pari stuff is not a bad idea! |
comment:2
Pari's symblic is not up to this. I'd consider it a bug that there is no default precision to SR series results (like with The rest of the ticket concerns possibly missing functions and I will move this to another ticket. |
comment:3
Hmm, that's an interesting suggestion. One could imagine it's a bug the other way around, but I have no vested interest in this - I think a default for either one could be useful, in principle, and (importantly) wouldn't be backward-incompatible. But what would the default be? It's hard to imagine one non-arbitrary... hmm. What do Mathematica and/or Maple and/or Magma do with this? If there is a standard one could use that. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
comment:4
I wrote earlier:
Nothing missing there except the a.g.m., fortunately. Replying to @kcrisman:
This is now #16201
If I ask for "cosine power series" in Wolfram Alpha I get |
comment:5
Edit: my copy of another comment was unrelated so I deleted it |
comment:7
Closing as wontfix since all issues mentioned have their own tickets. |
comment:8
I only see one ticket mentioned. Just for completeness, can you mention them (if there are others)? |
Some functions do not support rings/power-series*:
What is missing:
acos
,acosh
,asin
,asinh
,atan
,atanh
,cos
,cosh
,cotanh
,dilog
,gamma
,intformal
,lngamma
,psi
,sin
,sinh
,tan
,tanh
Component: calculus
Keywords: function, series expansion
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16197
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: