New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Regression in Pari finite field interface #16540
Comments
comment:1
Do you agree that the correct behaviour is a |
comment:3
PARI's |
comment:4
Replying to @jdemeyer:
I agree that mathematically the operation does not make sense, unless the modulus is equal to the order of the element (but computing it would be overkill in my opinion) or a multiple (the only reasonable one being cardinality - 1). Now, if we want to raise a
etc... |
Author: Peter Bruin |
Commit: |
comment:6
Here is a branch to make
The new code actually seems to be marginally faster than the old one (about 10% on this example). It also adds a warning to the documentation that we do not check for well-definedness before converting the exponent to an integer. |
comment:8
Reviewer name |
Reviewer: Jeroen Demeyer |
Changed branch from u/pbruin/16540-finite_field_exponentiation to |
In Sage 6.2
In 5.9 this used to give
CC: @pjbruin
Component: finite rings
Keywords: finite_field regression pari
Author: Peter Bruin
Branch/Commit:
5f6810f
Reviewer: Jeroen Demeyer
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16540
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: