New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
clean and speed up doctesting of bessel.py #16737
Comments
Commit: |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Author: Ralf Stephan |
New commits:
|
comment:3
You should use |
comment:4
Do you still need By the way, I find that the different regions differentiate themselves better with |
comment:6
All done, and included the string "Set plot_points to a higher value to get more detail" |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:9
I cannot see a commit from #16173 that is not included in my branch of this ticket, and I just pushed it, so it must be on trac too. |
Reviewer: Karl-Dieter Crisman |
Changed merged from #16173 to none |
comment:10
Okay, I got beta0 working and the two changes specific to this ticket are fine and I already checked they look good before. Nice. |
Changed branch from u/rws/clean_and_speed_up_doctesting_of_bessel_py to |
70% of long doctesting concerns four complex plots in
bessel.py
. Settingplot_points=10
will probably not affect doctest quality but would be much faster. Even if done with image output there seems no difference in quality of the produced images.This ticket applies all cleanup changes of #16023 and #16173 that are in
bessel.py
, as well as settingplot_points=10
. It results in a reduction of long doctesting time by 80%.Component: symbolics
Keywords: special, speed
Author: Ralf Stephan
Branch/Commit:
787c83f
Reviewer: Karl-Dieter Crisman
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16737
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: