Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Half-integral dimensions #17093

Open
nsirolli opened this issue Oct 2, 2014 · 60 comments
Open

Half-integral dimensions #17093

nsirolli opened this issue Oct 2, 2014 · 60 comments
Labels
c: modular forms p: minor / 4 s: needs work t: enhancement

Comments

@nsirolli
Copy link

nsirolli commented Oct 2, 2014

Added functionality for computing the dimensions of the spaces of modular (cusp) forms of half-integral weights, using the formulas given by Cohen-Oesterle and Serre-Stark.

Component: modular forms

Author: Nicolás Sirolli

Branch/Commit: public/ticket/17093 @ c63281f

Reviewer: Michael Neururer

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17093
@nsirolli nsirolli added this to the sage-6.4 milestone Oct 2, 2014
@nsirolli
Copy link
Author

nsirolli commented Oct 2, 2014

Branch: u/nmsirolli/half_integral_dimensions

@nsirolli
Copy link
Author

nsirolli commented Oct 2, 2014

Last 10 new commits:

c6d8d3bEstá todo mal?
0656c17Missing documentation, testing...
e13a7d9Added examples... but still not working.
0c5688bNeeds work...
2ecd8b5Doctest fails...
2be80fdFixed the integral case... still has bugs in the half-integral
ed4dd0dAdded documentation for is_totally_even
6930c58Done!
7827d2cAdded doctest for CohenOesterle
e3950edFinal version!

@nsirolli
Copy link
Author

nsirolli commented Oct 2, 2014

Author: Nicolás Sirolli

@nsirolli
Copy link
Author

nsirolli commented Oct 2, 2014

Changed branch from u/nmsirolli/half_integral_dimensions to u/nmsirolli/half_dims

@nsirolli

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@nsirolli
Copy link
Author

nsirolli commented Oct 2, 2014

Commit: e3950ed

@nsirolli

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@sagetrac-mneururer
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-mneururer mannequin commented Oct 11, 2014

Reviewer: Michael Neururer

@vbraun
Copy link
Member

vbraun commented Oct 11, 2014

comment:6

docbuild fails with

[arithgrou] 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position 18458: ordinal not in range(128)

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented Oct 14, 2014

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:

00519bfFixed problem with non-ascii character in congroup_gamma1.py.

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented Oct 14, 2014

Changed commit from e3950ed to 00519bf

@vbraun
Copy link
Member

vbraun commented Oct 14, 2014

comment:9

You should add # -*- coding: utf-8 -*- as the first line of the Python file, then you can use any utf-8 in docstrings.

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented Oct 14, 2014

Changed commit from 00519bf to d72d3b7

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented Oct 14, 2014

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:

d72d3b7Switched back to utf-8, following vbraun's advice.

@vbraun
Copy link
Member

vbraun commented Oct 21, 2014

comment:12

Completely breaks src/sage/modular/ssmod/ssmod.py, possibly other stuff. Run the testsuite...

@fchapoton fchapoton added this to the sage-8.8 milestone Mar 16, 2019
@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented Mar 16, 2019

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:

c63281ftrac 17093 fix last doctest

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented Mar 16, 2019

Changed commit from 6090d17 to c63281f

@fchapoton
Copy link
Contributor

comment:39

red branch => needs work

@embray
Copy link
Contributor

embray commented Jun 14, 2019

comment:41

Tickets still needing working or clarification should be moved to the next release milestone at the soonest (please feel free to revert if you think the ticket is close to being resolved).

@embray embray modified the milestones: sage-8.8, sage-8.9 Jun 14, 2019
@embray
Copy link
Contributor

embray commented Dec 30, 2019

comment:42

Ticket retargeted after milestone closed

@embray embray modified the milestones: sage-8.9, sage-9.1 Dec 30, 2019
@mkoeppe
Copy link
Member

mkoeppe commented Apr 14, 2020

comment:43

Batch modifying tickets that will likely not be ready for 9.1, based on a review of the ticket title, branch/review status, and last modification date.

@mkoeppe mkoeppe modified the milestones: sage-9.1, sage-9.2 Apr 14, 2020
@mkoeppe mkoeppe modified the milestones: sage-9.2, sage-9.3 Sep 5, 2020
@mkoeppe
Copy link
Member

mkoeppe commented Feb 13, 2021

comment:45

Setting new milestone based on a cursory review of ticket status, priority, and last modification date.

@mkoeppe mkoeppe modified the milestones: sage-9.3, sage-9.4 Feb 13, 2021
@mkoeppe
Copy link
Member

mkoeppe commented Jul 19, 2021

comment:46

Setting a new milestone for this ticket based on a cursory review.

@mkoeppe mkoeppe modified the milestones: sage-9.4, sage-9.5 Jul 19, 2021
@mkoeppe mkoeppe modified the milestones: sage-9.5, sage-9.6 Dec 18, 2021
@mkoeppe mkoeppe modified the milestones: sage-9.6, sage-9.7 Apr 2, 2022
@mkoeppe mkoeppe modified the milestones: sage-9.7, sage-9.8 Sep 19, 2022
@mkoeppe mkoeppe removed this from the sage-9.8 milestone Jan 29, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
c: modular forms p: minor / 4 s: needs work t: enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
5 participants
@embray @vbraun @fchapoton @mkoeppe @nsirolli