We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
In contrast to RealIntervalFieldElement, ComplexIntervalFieldElement did not implement __nonzero___.
RealIntervalFieldElement
ComplexIntervalFieldElement
__nonzero___
RealIntervalFieldElement.__nonzero__ returns True if it is not known to be exactly zero.
RealIntervalFieldElement.__nonzero__
True
This patch implements the same for ComplexIntervalFieldElement.
CC: @dkrenn @sagetrac-skropf
Component: numerical
Keywords: complex interval, CIF
Author: Clemens Heuberger
Branch/Commit: 659240e
659240e
Reviewer: Jeroen Demeyer
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17105
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sorry, something went wrong.
Changed branch from u/cheuberg/rings/CIF-nonzero to 659240e
4aea1b0
No branches or pull requests
In contrast to
RealIntervalFieldElement
,ComplexIntervalFieldElement
did not implement__nonzero___
.RealIntervalFieldElement.__nonzero__
returnsTrue
if it is not known to be exactly zero.This patch implements the same for
ComplexIntervalFieldElement
.CC: @dkrenn @sagetrac-skropf
Component: numerical
Keywords: complex interval, CIF
Author: Clemens Heuberger
Branch/Commit:
659240e
Reviewer: Jeroen Demeyer
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17105
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: