New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
not all fractions get converted with ex.fraction() #17736
Comments
Commit: |
New commits:
|
Author: Ralf Stephan |
comment:3
Passes all patchbot tests. |
Reviewer: Martin Albrecht |
comment:4
Looks good to me. A potential feature request could be to allow the user to specify the ordering of variables, but perhaps that's overkill? |
comment:5
I'm not so familiar with algebra. Would you suggest specific orderings or is there a convention? |
comment:6
Hi, sorry for not being clear: I merely meant the ordering of variable (names), where you currently call Of course, arbitrary term ordering ("lex" and "deglex" etc.) could also be considered. But I'd say a user should do the conversion by hand perhaps in this case. |
comment:7
Replying to @malb:
Ah but yes, I agree. Thanks for the review. |
Changed branch from u/rws/not_all_fractions_get_converted_with_ex_fraction__ to |
The
1
apparently gets coerced into thex
-ring, so we need to ensure equal rings somehow.Component: symbolics
Author: Ralf Stephan
Branch/Commit:
b46d1df
Reviewer: Martin Albrecht
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17736
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: