Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inconsistency with 0^0 #18088

Closed
kcrisman opened this issue Mar 30, 2015 · 15 comments
Closed

Inconsistency with 0^0 #18088

kcrisman opened this issue Mar 30, 2015 · 15 comments

Comments

@kcrisman
Copy link
Member

See this ask.sagemath question. Apparently Ginac says zero to the zero is undefined but most of the rest of Sage (in accordance with IEEE) says it is one:

sage: ZZ(0)^ZZ(0)
1

but

sage: SR(0)^SR(0)
ValueError: power::eval(): pow(0,0) is undefined

Issue at pynac/pynac#20

Depends on #18362

Upstream: Fixed upstream, in a later stable release.

Component: symbolics

Keywords: pynac

Author: Ralf Stephan

Branch/Commit: 4df15dd

Reviewer: Travis Scrimshaw

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18088

@kcrisman kcrisman added this to the sage-6.6 milestone Mar 30, 2015
@sagetrac-tmonteil

This comment has been minimized.

@rwst
Copy link

rwst commented Apr 19, 2015

Changed keywords from none to pynac

@rwst

This comment has been minimized.

@rwst
Copy link

rwst commented Apr 19, 2015

Upstream: Reported upstream. Developers acknowledge bug.

@rwst rwst modified the milestones: sage-6.6, sage-6.7 Apr 19, 2015
@rwst
Copy link

rwst commented Apr 19, 2015

Branch: u/rws/inconsistency_with_0_0

@rwst
Copy link

rwst commented Apr 19, 2015

New commits:

4df15dd18088: doctest for fix of pynac issue 20

@rwst
Copy link

rwst commented Apr 19, 2015

Commit: 4df15dd

@rwst
Copy link

rwst commented Apr 19, 2015

Changed upstream from Reported upstream. Developers acknowledge bug. to Fixed upstream, in a later stable release.

@rwst
Copy link

rwst commented Apr 19, 2015

Author: Ralf Stephan

@rwst
Copy link

rwst commented Apr 19, 2015

Dependencies: upcoming pynac-0.3.6

@kcrisman
Copy link
Member Author

comment:5

Should such tickets be "sage-pending", since the upcoming pynac isn't (yet) on a Sage ticket (or maybe it is since I last looked)? Just a procedure question, not a high priority question.

@rwst rwst removed this from the sage-6.7 milestone Apr 20, 2015
@rwst rwst added the pending label Apr 20, 2015
@rwst
Copy link

rwst commented May 4, 2015

Changed dependencies from upcoming pynac-0.3.6 to #18362

@rwst rwst added this to the sage-6.7 milestone May 5, 2015
@rwst rwst removed the pending label May 5, 2015
@tscrim
Copy link
Collaborator

tscrim commented May 10, 2015

comment:9

LGTM.

@tscrim
Copy link
Collaborator

tscrim commented May 10, 2015

Reviewer: Travis Scrimshaw

@vbraun
Copy link
Member

vbraun commented May 14, 2015

Changed branch from u/rws/inconsistency_with_0_0 to 4df15dd

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants