New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Inconsistency with 0^0 #18088
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Changed keywords from none to pynac |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Upstream: Reported upstream. Developers acknowledge bug. |
Branch: u/rws/inconsistency_with_0_0 |
New commits:
|
Commit: |
Changed upstream from Reported upstream. Developers acknowledge bug. to Fixed upstream, in a later stable release. |
Author: Ralf Stephan |
Dependencies: upcoming pynac-0.3.6 |
comment:5
Should such tickets be "sage-pending", since the upcoming pynac isn't (yet) on a Sage ticket (or maybe it is since I last looked)? Just a procedure question, not a high priority question. |
Changed dependencies from upcoming pynac-0.3.6 to #18362 |
comment:9
LGTM. |
Reviewer: Travis Scrimshaw |
Changed branch from u/rws/inconsistency_with_0_0 to |
See this ask.sagemath question. Apparently Ginac says zero to the zero is undefined but most of the rest of Sage (in accordance with IEEE) says it is one:
but
Issue at pynac/pynac#20
Depends on #18362
Upstream: Fixed upstream, in a later stable release.
Component: symbolics
Keywords: pynac
Author: Ralf Stephan
Branch/Commit:
4df15dd
Reviewer: Travis Scrimshaw
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18088
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: