Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

improve constructions/calculus.rst on power series #18098

Closed
rwst opened this issue Apr 1, 2015 · 15 comments
Closed

improve constructions/calculus.rst on power series #18098

rwst opened this issue Apr 1, 2015 · 15 comments

Comments

@rwst
Copy link

rwst commented Apr 1, 2015

That chapter is widely wrong and misses lots of things.

http://www.sagemath.org/doc/constructions/calculus.html#power-series

Component: documentation

Author: Ralf Stephan

Branch/Commit: 0edaa39

Reviewer: Frédéric Chapoton

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18098

@rwst rwst added this to the sage-6.6 milestone Apr 1, 2015
@rwst
Copy link
Author

rwst commented Apr 1, 2015

@rwst
Copy link
Author

rwst commented Apr 1, 2015

New commits:

e95e2d518098: improve constructions/calculus.rst on power series

@rwst
Copy link
Author

rwst commented Apr 1, 2015

Commit: e95e2d5

@rwst
Copy link
Author

rwst commented Apr 1, 2015

Author: Ralf Stephan

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented Apr 2, 2015

Changed commit from e95e2d5 to 9dfb869

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented Apr 2, 2015

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:

9dfb86918098: cosmetics; fix typo

@fchapoton
Copy link
Contributor

comment:4

one failing doctest, see patchbot report

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented Apr 3, 2015

Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:

a95a4c818098: fix doctest

@sagetrac-git
Copy link
Mannequin

sagetrac-git mannequin commented Apr 3, 2015

Changed commit from 9dfb869 to a95a4c8

@fchapoton
Copy link
Contributor

comment:7

Looks good to me. I have added a few examples of usage for the QQ[[w]] case.

If you agree, please set to positive review.


New commits:

89f5b64Merge branch 'u/rws/improve_constructions_calculus_rst_on_power_series' into 6.6.rc3
0edaa39trac #18098 little more doc on QQ[[w]] in constructions.rst

@fchapoton
Copy link
Contributor

Changed commit from a95a4c8 to 0edaa39

@fchapoton
Copy link
Contributor

@fchapoton
Copy link
Contributor

Reviewer: Frédéric Chapoton

@rwst
Copy link
Author

rwst commented Apr 13, 2015

comment:8

Thanks.

@vbraun
Copy link
Member

vbraun commented Apr 14, 2015

Changed branch from public/ticket/18098 to 0edaa39

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants