New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update git_trac to the latest commit of the repository #18477
Comments
Commit: |
Branch: public/18477 |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
comment:5
The tarball is missing a top-level directory (usually called |
comment:6
Arg, sorry for that. I built it with "git archive" but it was not such a good idea after all. Will be fixed in a second. |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. This was a forced push. New commits:
|
comment:9
I would be even better if |
Reviewer: Jeroen Demeyer |
Changed branch from public/18477 to |
Changed commit from |
comment:12
Well. In terms of 'clean code', what would you think of a way to decorate functions which use a remote? The decorator would check that the remotes exist, and if they do not create them before running the function? Or do you think that it's 'oversolving' the problem? Nathann |
comment:13
Replying to @nathanncohen:
I think that's a good solution. Just make sure that the "ensure that the But really, this is Volker's code, so it's better to ask him. |
comment:14
I trust your sense of 'cleanness' more than I trust mine on those matters.
Yes of course. Nathann |
comment:15
This is sagemath/git-trac-command#22 |
By updating Sage's shipped version of git_trac, we make it possible to checkout tickets without having a trac account.
http://www.steinertriples.fr/ncohen/tmp/git_trac-20150522.tar.bz2
CC: @jdemeyer @vbraun @videlec
Component: packages: standard
Author: Nathann Cohen
Branch:
2fd06da
Reviewer: Jeroen Demeyer
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18477
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: