Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Doctests of database_gap happen to depend on gap_packages #18879

Closed
EmmanuelCharpentier mannequin opened this issue Jul 11, 2015 · 5 comments
Closed

Doctests of database_gap happen to depend on gap_packages #18879

EmmanuelCharpentier mannequin opened this issue Jul 11, 2015 · 5 comments

Comments

@EmmanuelCharpentier
Copy link
Mannequin

EmmanuelCharpentier mannequin commented Jul 11, 2015

Starting with 6.8beta8, these two doctests :

sage -t --long --warn-long 65.9 src/sage/groups/perm_gps/permgroup_named.py  # 2 doctests failed
sage -t --long --warn-long 65.9 src/sage/tests/gap_packages.py  # 1 doctest failed

fail with database_gap installed but succeed after installation of gap_packages.

CC: @vbraun

Component: packages: optional

Author: Dima Pasechnik

Reviewer: Volker Braun

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18879

@EmmanuelCharpentier EmmanuelCharpentier mannequin added this to the sage-6.8 milestone Jul 11, 2015
@dimpase
Copy link
Member

dimpase commented Jul 11, 2015

comment:1

This is fixed in #43

I wonder if there is a way to unify this with the branch to be reported on the ticket (well, hopefully this is not necessary).

@jdemeyer
Copy link

comment:2

Has anybody checked that the problem is really that those doctests themselves are the problem? i.e. do make distclean, install database_gap and check the doctests...

@vbraun
Copy link
Member

vbraun commented Jul 11, 2015

Reviewer: Volker Braun

@vbraun
Copy link
Member

vbraun commented Jul 11, 2015

Author: Dima Pasechnik

@vbraun
Copy link
Member

vbraun commented Jul 11, 2015

comment:3

Duplicate of #18880

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants