New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for general c_{ij} for Nakajima monomials and some cleanup #18895
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
comment:1
I am recycling this ticket because I couldn't improve the weight function. New commits:
|
Commit: |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:5
Variant which uses an instance option rather than global option for setting the display output. New commits:
|
Changed branch from public/crystals/general_c_monomial-18895 to public/crystals/general_c_monomial_v2-18895 |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:8
Hey Travis, Thanks for doing this! I made a bunch of documentation fixes and improvements. Also, I changed |
Reviewer: Ben Salisbury |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:10
I noticed that we aren't properly using the |
Changed branch from public/crystals/general_c_monomial_v2-18895 to |
The definition allows a choice of a general cij matrix such that cij + cji = 1 for all
i != j
.We also perform some cleanup:
CC: @sagetrac-sage-combinat @bsalisbury1
Component: combinatorics
Keywords: crystals, nakajima monomials
Author: Travis Scrimshaw
Branch/Commit:
5da5f89
Reviewer: Ben Salisbury
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18895
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: