New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Minor typos in 6.8 #19023
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Commit: |
Branch: u/ncohen/19023 |
comment:3
Hellooooooooo ! I fixed some of the points you listed here, and so I add the commit. To be honest I am a bit scared to add a commit on a ticket that is not in Nathann New commits:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Changed branch from u/ncohen/19023 to public/ticket/19023 |
comment:8
Replying to @fchapoton:
But then we should just open a new one... And I guess 6.9 will not be out for some time. I did this because a) Nathann hoped for less tickets, at least tickets only correcting a typo or two, b) Sage seems to still have small typos that I found when reading the manuals, and c) for me it seems unlogical to correct totally non-relating typo in some ticket. As an artifical example: Let's suppose that I wonder about Frattini sublattice. When thinking about docstring I see a typo in Frattini subgroup. Now I should make a note about the typo, so that I won't forget it when I make a patch at last. |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:10
I look throught your pathces. Two questions:
Otherwise all seems good. As beta5 is already out, maybe we should close this and start collecting typos for 6.10. Please also review my small patch that add two links. |
Reviewer: Jori Mäntysalo |
Changed author from Jori Mäntysalo to Nathann Cohen, Frédéric Chapoton, Jori Mäntysalo |
comment:11
Yo,
Because the function does not exist anymore (#17462)
Odd. Well, I guess it was meant to be references toward Nathann |
comment:12
To me Nathann |
comment:13
Replying to @nathanncohen:
Arghs. As #18534 got rejected, now there is no way for the user to found |
comment:14
I do not think that the category of Posets is meant to be internal. |
comment:15
Replying to @nathanncohen:
I guess you meant the category of finite posets. Then my patch should be OK (but needs review, of course). And now just |
comment:16
Oh, my mistake. I was thinking of the class |
comment:17
I will change some |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:20
Replying to @nathanncohen:
I removed those links. Ready for review. |
comment:21
Okay. |
comment:22
Nathann, look at |
comment:23
On my machine it seems fine. |
comment:24
Replying to @nathanncohen:
Arghs. Partially built documentation. Sorry for noice. |
comment:25
Beta6 was released, so maybe this one should be closed. Nathann is busy. Frédéric, can you check my changes: 1) "M"oibus" to "Möbius" is |
comment:26
There is no problem with those commits, consider them reviewed. |
Changed reviewer from Jori Mäntysalo to Jori Mäntysalo, Nathann Cohen |
comment:27
Replying to @nathanncohen:
Then everything is reviewed. I added your name to reviewrs list. Thanks. |
Changed branch from public/ticket/19023 to |
This is a container ticket for minor documentation typos found in version 6.8. I'll add them here, if I am not doing another ticket for same part of Sage. Of course others can also make additions to this.
successors
broken link. Same with depth first.}
Component: documentation
Author: Nathann Cohen, Frédéric Chapoton, Jori Mäntysalo
Branch/Commit:
712ebe8
Reviewer: Jori Mäntysalo, Nathann Cohen
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19023
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: