New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
LatticePoset: add is_join_semidistributive #20714
Comments
Branch: u/jmantysalo/semidistributive |
Commit: |
comment:3
missing doctest continuation here:
|
comment:4
And shortcut based on covering relations count is in wrong place. I don't like this test system that does not detect missing continuation line. |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:6
OK, maybe this works. It would be a good idea to think about this, not just blindly translate the definition to code. Maybe later. |
comment:7
typo here:
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:9
You can also use |
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:11
another typo
|
Branch pushed to git repo; I updated commit sha1. New commits:
|
comment:13
looks good to me. |
Reviewer: Frédéric Chapoton |
Changed branch from u/jmantysalo/semidistributive to |
This patch will add a function to check if a lattice is join-semidistributive or not.
Backend can also check for meet-semidistributive and give a "certificate", i.e. elements failing the definition of semidistributive. It is not used at this time.
Component: combinatorics
Author: Jori Mäntysalo
Branch/Commit:
b4c99b6
Reviewer: Frédéric Chapoton
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/20714
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: