Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Upgrade pyzmq to version 16.0.0 #21697

Closed
jdemeyer opened this issue Oct 13, 2016 · 6 comments
Closed

Upgrade pyzmq to version 16.0.0 #21697

jdemeyer opened this issue Oct 13, 2016 · 6 comments
Labels
c: packages: standard p: major / 3 t: enhancement
Milestone
sage-7.5

Comments

@jdemeyer
Copy link

This is mostly needed to support the upcoming Cython 0.25.

Upstream: https://pypi.python.org/packages/12/b8/06a9c0769d1f8024f8ffc516e4150a959d05658fc27eaead5cc199d31194/pyzmq-16.0.0.tar.gz

Component: packages: standard

Author: Jeroen Demeyer

Branch/Commit: 636b22a

Reviewer: Travis Scrimshaw

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21697
@jdemeyer jdemeyer added this to the sage-7.4 milestone Oct 13, 2016
@jdemeyer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@jdemeyer
Copy link
Author

Branch: u/jdemeyer/upgrade_pyzmq_to_version_16_0_0

@jdemeyer
Copy link
Author

New commits:

636b22aUpgrade to pyzmq 16.0.0

@jdemeyer
Copy link
Author

Commit: 636b22a

@jdemeyer jdemeyer modified the milestones: sage-7.4, sage-7.5 Oct 13, 2016
@tscrim
Copy link
Collaborator

tscrim commented Oct 18, 2016

Reviewer: Travis Scrimshaw

@vbraun
Copy link
Member

vbraun commented Oct 29, 2016

Changed branch from u/jdemeyer/upgrade_pyzmq_to_version_16_0_0 to 636b22a

@vbraun vbraun closed this as completed in dfe6b11 Oct 29, 2016
@jdemeyer jdemeyer mentioned this issue Oct 29, 2016
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
c: packages: standard p: major / 3 t: enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
sage-7.5
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@vbraun @tscrim @jdemeyer