Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix build of coxeter3 #21759

Closed
tscrim opened this issue Oct 24, 2016 · 6 comments
Closed

Fix build of coxeter3 #21759

tscrim opened this issue Oct 24, 2016 · 6 comments
Labels
c: packages: optional p: major / 3 t: bug
Milestone
sage-7.5

Comments

@tscrim
Copy link
Collaborator

tscrim commented Oct 24, 2016

Likely due to gcc being stricter as there is a double-declaration.

Upstream: tscrim/coxeter#15

Upstream: Fixed upstream, but not in a stable release.

CC: @Thierry-Dumont @slel

Component: packages: optional

Keywords: coxeter3

Author: Thierry Dumont

Branch: 62d465a

Reviewer: Travis Scrimshaw

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21759
@tscrim tscrim added this to the sage-7.5 milestone Oct 24, 2016
@vbraun
Copy link
Member

vbraun commented Oct 31, 2016

Changed branch from public/packages/fix_coxeter3_build to 62d465a

@vbraun vbraun closed this as completed in 038e6ad Oct 31, 2016
@jdemeyer
Copy link

Upstream: Reported upstream. No feedback yet.

@jdemeyer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@jdemeyer
Copy link

Changed commit from 62d465a to none

@slel
Copy link
Member

slel commented Jun 24, 2018

Changed keywords from none to coxeter3

@slel
Copy link
Member

slel commented Jun 24, 2018

Changed upstream from Reported upstream. No feedback yet. to Fixed upstream, but not in a stable release.

@jdemeyer jdemeyer mentioned this issue May 9, 2018
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
c: packages: optional p: major / 3 t: bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
sage-7.5
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@vbraun @tscrim @slel @jdemeyer