New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Simplifying 0**x gives 0, with no assumptions on x #22027
Comments
comment:1
That is a Maxima bug. |
comment:2
Are we ok with sage returning 1 for 0^0? This is the case in Python, but in Maxima is it undefined. Is maxima under active development? Should we report that issue there? Note that sympy handles this properly:
|
comment:3
Singular says
I would say this is clearly wrong: |
comment:4
Ask Sage question 61400 makes me raise the priority of this one. One should note that
Furthermore:
But, indeed:
Since |
Upstream: Not yet reported upstream; Will do shortly. |
comment:5
The "maxima-discuss" mailing list had a thread last month (from there click "View entire thread"). |
Check this:
but
Upstream: Not yet reported upstream; Will do shortly.
Component: symbolics
Keywords: simplify
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22027
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: