We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
See this ask.sagemath question. Basically, at least in certain situations involving abs(), you
abs()
var('x y a b') f=[1+y-a*abs_symbolic(x)==x, b*x==y]; f solve(f, [x, y])
gives boom, or more precisely
TypeError: cannot coerce arguments: no canonical coercion from <type 'list'> to Symbolic Ring
since it somehow is trying to make this into one object. But
assume(x>0) solve(f, [x, y])
gives not boom. So somehow our code for recognizing when we have a system of equations isn't working right in the first case. Note that
var('x y a b') f=[1+y-a*x==x, b*x==y] solve(f,[x,y]
apparently works fine.
Component: symbolics
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22149
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
still the same in 9.4.beta4
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
See this ask.sagemath question. Basically, at least in certain situations involving
abs()
, yougives boom, or more precisely
since it somehow is trying to make this into one object. But
gives not boom. So somehow our code for recognizing when we have a system of equations isn't working right in the first case. Note that
apparently works fine.
Component: symbolics
Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22149
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: